Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Stanlek Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Stanlek Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 11, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/27815

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stanlek Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)(105)LC762Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. we waive pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay recovery thereof, and proceed to dispose off the appeal itself with the consent of both sides.2. the brief facts of the case are that, the appellants are manufacturers of motor parts falling under chapter 8536.90. they also manufacturer on job work for m/s. lucas indian services. the appellants avail benefit of ssi exemption under notification no. 8/99 dated 28.2.1999 for their own branded and unbranded goods and pay full duty on the branded goods manufactured for m/s. lucas. the appellants cleared their own goods valued at rs. 7,11,680/- during the period from 1.10.1999 to 29.2.1999 at 'nil' rate of duty. the deptt. issued a show cause notice dated 31.3.1999 to the appellants alleging that, since the appellants are availing the benefit of modvat credit they ought to have paid duty on the clearance of their own goods, therefore duty of rs. 68,321.29, is recoverable from them. the show cause notice was confirmed by the assistant commissioner vide order-in original on the grounds that appellants could not produce any record that they have not utilised the inputs on which the modvat is availed, into the manufacture of their own final goods cleared under ssi exemption. he cited boards letter no. 263/4/93-cx-8, circular no. 9/93 cx-8 dated 24.8.93 wherein simultaneous availment of modvat and ssi exemption was not permitted. a penalty of rs. 2,000 was also imposed on the appellants. lower appellate authority dismissed the appeal of assessee; hence this appeal.3. on hearing both sides we find that the issue in dispute namely as to whether assessee can simultaneously avail of ssi exemption in respect of their own goods and avail modvat credit after paying duty, on branded goods manufactured on job work basis has been decided by the larger bench of the tribunal in the case of franco italian company ltd. v. commissioner of central excise mumbai reported in 2000 (40) rlt 295, in which it was held that such simultaneous.....

Full Judgment

1. We waive pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay recovery thereof, and proceed to dispose off the appeal itself with the consent of both sides.

2. The brief facts of the case are that, the appellants are manufacturers of Motor parts falling under chapter 8536.90. They also manufacturer on job work for M/s. Lucas Indian Services. The appellants avail benefit of SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/99 dated 28.2.1999 for their own branded and unbranded goods and pay full duty on the branded goods manufactured for M/s. Lucas. The appellants cleared their own goods valued at Rs. 7,11,680/- during the period from 1.10.1999 to 29.2.1999 at 'Nil' rate of duty. The deptt. issued a show cause notice dated 31.3.1999 to the appellants alleging that, since the appellants are availing the benefit of modvat credit they ought to have paid duty on the clearance of their own goods, therefore duty of Rs. 68,321.29, is recoverable from them. The show cause notice was confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner vide order-in original on the grounds that appellants could not produce any record that they have not utilised the inputs on which the modvat is availed, into the manufacture of their own final goods cleared under SSI exemption. He cited Boards letter No. 263/4/93-CX-8, circular No. 9/93 CX-8 dated 24.8.93 wherein simultaneous availment of modvat and SSI exemption was not permitted. A penalty of Rs. 2,000 was also imposed on the appellants. Lower appellate authority dismissed the appeal of assessee; hence this appeal.

3. On hearing both sides we find that the issue in dispute namely as to whether assessee can simultaneously avail of SSI exemption in respect of their own goods and avail modvat credit after paying duty, on branded goods manufactured on job work basis has been decided by the larger bench of the Tribunal in the case of Franco Italian Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai reported in 2000 (40) RLT 295, in which it was held that such simultaneous availment was permisible in law. Following the ration of above decision, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial