Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Starwire India Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs Starwire India Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 26, 2002
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/27697

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

Starwire India Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2002)(143)ELT373TriDel

Excerpt

1. these supplementary appeals were ordered to be dismissed as time-barred by the tribunal vide order no. a/1063-1070/2001 (nb-s), dated 6-8-2001.2. the main appeal of the appellants/revenue also stands dismissed on merits even. these supplementary appeals sought to be admitted after condoning the delay though relates to the different period, but the main issue is the same. since the main appeal stands dismissed and similar cods were also dismissed by the tribunal, the present cods are also not legally maintainable and ordered to be dismissed.3. similarly, the roas of the revenue seeking restoration of the appeals which were dismissed as time-barred, are also not legally maintainable and the same are ordered to be dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. These supplementary appeals were ordered to be dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal vide Order No. A/1063-1070/2001 (NB-S), dated 6-8-2001.

2. The main appeal of the appellants/Revenue also stands dismissed on merits even. These supplementary appeals sought to be admitted after condoning the delay though relates to the different period, but the main issue is the same. Since the main appeal stands dismissed and similar CODs were also dismissed by the Tribunal, the present CODs are also not legally maintainable and ordered to be dismissed.

3. Similarly, the ROAs of the Revenue seeking restoration of the appeals which were dismissed as time-barred, are also not legally maintainable and the same are ordered to be dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial