Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Sivan Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

A. Sivan vs Commissioner of Customs and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Nov 07, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/26607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Sivan

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs and

Excerpt

1. this application is for waiver of pe-deposit of duty amounting to rs. 7,31,04,575/- and penalty totally amounting to rs. 9,52,49,392.83.these penalties are imposed on proprietary units of which the applicant shri a sivan is the common proprietor. the duty was confirmed on the goods manufactured and cleared without payment of duty and also on the goods cleared under exemption notification to which they were not entitled.2. in the said application it is claimed that the applicant has no money. an affidavit to that effect has also been filed. counsel for the applicant submits that the factory of the applicant was attached by the department under rule 230 of the central excise rules, 1944 and that there are no other properties capable of being attached. he, however, submits that the applicant has no objection to the department locating any property for attaching or to the disposal of the properties already under attachment. the current balance sheet is also filed showing assets which could be attached.3. in view of this submission we grant the prayer for waiver of pre-deposit leaving it to the department to recover all or part of the sums involved by legal means.

Full Judgment

1. This application is for waiver of pe-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 7,31,04,575/- and penalty totally amounting to Rs. 9,52,49,392.83.

These penalties are imposed on proprietary units of which the applicant Shri A Sivan is the common proprietor. The duty was confirmed on the goods manufactured and cleared without payment of duty and also on the goods cleared under exemption notification to which they were not entitled.

2. In the said application it is claimed that the applicant has no money. An affidavit to that effect has also been filed. Counsel for the applicant submits that the factory of the applicant was attached by the department under Rule 230 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and that there are no other properties capable of being attached. He, however, submits that the applicant has no objection to the department locating any property for attaching or to the disposal of the properties already under attachment. The current balance sheet is also filed showing assets which could be attached.

3. In view of this submission we grant the prayer for waiver of pre-deposit leaving it to the department to recover all or part of the sums involved by legal means.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial