Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jyoti Structures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Jyoti Structures Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Nov 06, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/26584

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jyoti Structures Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs and

Excerpt

1. the commissioner (appeals) dismissed the appeal before him for failure to deposit the entire duty and penalty as ordered by him on the stay application filed by the appellant before him.2. the original authority has demanded the duty on the bolts and nuts that the applicant purchased from outside and supplied to the buyers of the parts of electrical transmission towers in order for these to be assembled and erected at site. the contention of the counsel for the applicant that no duty is payable upon bought out item that it did not manufacture is prima facie acceptable.3. accordingly we set aside the order of the commissioner (appeals), allow the appeal and restore the appeal to him for disposal on merits, without insisting on any deposit, in due course.

Full Judgment

1. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal before him for failure to deposit the entire duty and penalty as ordered by him on the stay application filed by the appellant before him.

2. The original authority has demanded the duty on the bolts and nuts that the applicant purchased from outside and supplied to the buyers of the parts of electrical transmission towers in order for these to be assembled and erected at site. The contention of the counsel for the applicant that no duty is payable upon bought out item that it did not manufacture is prima facie acceptable.

3. Accordingly we set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), allow the appeal and restore the appeal to him for disposal on merits, without insisting on any deposit, in due course.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial