Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gansons Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Gansons Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise,

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 31, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/25334

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gansons Ltd.

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Excerpt

1. the question for consideration in this appeal is the liability for inclusion in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellant of the notional interest (that is to say, interest is not actually paid) on the advances that the appellant received from the buyers of these goods towards their price.2. in the order impugned in this appeal, the commissioner (appeals) has confirmed the liability to the inclusion.vst industries ltd. v. cce 1998 (97) elt 395) that in the absence of anything to show that the fact that the advances has the effect of reducing the value of the goods sold to the buyers who paid the advances, interest nominally payable on the advances is not includible in the value for the proposes of assessment. the reasons advanced in the impugned order that, but for the advances, the manufacturer would have compelled to resort to commercial borrowing is insufficient to establish the required nexus.

Full Judgment

1. The question for consideration in this appeal is the liability for inclusion in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellant of the notional interest (that is to say, interest is not actually paid) on the advances that the appellant received from the buyers of these goods towards their price.

2. In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the liability to the inclusion.VST Industries Ltd. v. CCE 1998 (97) ELT 395) that in the absence of anything to show that the fact that the advances has the effect of reducing the value of the goods sold to the buyers who paid the advances, interest nominally payable on the advances is not includible in the value for the proposes of assessment. The reasons advanced in the impugned order that, but for the advances, the manufacturer would have compelled to resort to commercial borrowing is insufficient to establish the required nexus.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial