Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abbas Master Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Abbas Master vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 08, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abbas Master

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Excerpt

1. the application is for waiver of deposit of penalty of rs. 25 lakhs.the penalty has been imposed on the applicant on the ground that he was concerned with exporting quantities of masoor dal misdeclared to be partially oriented yarn.2. counsel for the applicant says that there is no basis for the commissioner's conclusion. the statements of chhotalal hirji mamania and makrand a. bhaskar do not implicate the applicant at all. the applicant was a broker in the transaction between rajeev pathak and excel international with regard to sale of poy manufactured by the latter and that is why his bank account had been made use of by these person.3. the department representative points out that the commissioner has relied upon the statement of the applicant himself, admitting his involvement in the loading of masoor dal in the export containers which were stated to contain yarn. he points out that eh counsel for the applicant is not able to substantiate his contention that the applicant retracted the admissions made in his statement within a day or two.4. we take note of this point. we also not that it is not a ground in the appeal that the applicant did not make the admissions in the statement that the commissioner finds that he has made. on this prima facie view we direct deposit by the applicant of rs. 10 lakhs within two months from today. thereupon we waive deposit of remaining amount of penalty.

Full Judgment

1. The application is for waiver of deposit of penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs.

The penalty has been imposed on the applicant on the ground that he was concerned with exporting quantities of masoor dal misdeclared to be partially oriented yarn.

2. Counsel for the applicant says that there is no basis for the Commissioner's conclusion. The statements of Chhotalal Hirji Mamania and Makrand A. Bhaskar do not implicate the applicant at all. The applicant was a broker in the transaction between Rajeev Pathak and Excel International with regard to sale of POY manufactured by the latter and that is why his bank account had been made use of by these person.

3. The department representative points out that the commissioner has relied upon the statement of the applicant himself, admitting his involvement in the loading of masoor dal in the export containers which were stated to contain yarn. he points out that eh counsel for the applicant is not able to substantiate his contention that the applicant retracted the admissions made in his statement within a day or two.

4. We take note of this point. We also not that it is not a ground in the appeal that the applicant did not make the admissions in the statement that the Commissioner finds that he has made. On this prima facie view we direct deposit by the applicant of Rs. 10 lakhs within two months from today. Thereupon we waive deposit of remaining amount of penalty.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial