Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ujwal Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Ujwal Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Aug 07, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/24863

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Ujwal Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the question for consideration in this appeal is the includability in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the respondent on job work of the excise duty paid on coils of iron supplied by the customer, which it worked upon to make the finished product. relying upon the decision of the tribunal in dia ichi karkaria vs. cce 1996 (12) rlt 261 the commissioner (appeals) has held that since the duty was available to be taken as modvat credit by the manufacturer, it would not be includable in the assessable value.2. the sole ground in the department's appeal to challenge this conclusion is that the it does not accept the correctness of this decision. the supreme court has declined to reverse the decision of the tribunal and, in its judgment in 1999 (112) elt 353, dismissed the department's appeal against it. there is no ground for interference.

Full Judgment

1. The question for consideration in this appeal is the includability in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the respondent on job work of the excise duty paid on coils of iron supplied by the customer, which it worked upon to make the finished product. Relying upon the decision of the Tribunal in Dia Ichi Karkaria vs. CCE 1996 (12) RLT 261 the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that since the duty was available to be taken as modvat credit by the manufacturer, it would not be includable in the assessable value.

2. The sole ground in the department's appeal to challenge this conclusion is that the it does not accept the correctness of this decision. The Supreme Court has declined to reverse the decision of the Tribunal and, in its judgment in 1999 (112) ELT 353, dismissed the department's appeal against it. There is no ground for interference.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial