Full Judgment
CCE 1991 (56) ELT 168 and that is permissible. This conclusion is challenged in this appeal.
2. The respondent is absent and unrepresented and by its communication of 3.7.01 made the following points. The modvat scheme is a self contained code and is governed by the relevant rules. The small scale exemption is a separate and independent code and the two cannot be interlinked. None of the rules relating to modvat contain any requirement requiring full exemption for all the products.
3. The respondent's contention is untenable. We are not concerned with the rules relating of the modvat. We are concerned with the applicability of the notification. In doing so, we have to record the condition subject to which the exemption contained in the notification is availed.
4. The departmental representative cites before me the decision of the larger bench of the Tribunal in Kamani Foods vs. CCE 1995 (75) ELT 202 holding that full exemption under 175/86 will not be available to manufacturer for any goods made by him if he avails of modvat credit facility for any other specified goods. The relevant words in the notification 175/86 corresponds with those of notification 1/93. The ratio of this decision would apply to the facts before me. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) therefore cannot be accepted.
5. The appeal is allowed and impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside. The order of the Asst. Commissioner is restored.