M/S. Vikram Cement Vs. Cce, Indore

M/S. Vikram Cement vs Cce, Indore

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 18, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/23145

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/23145
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: May 18, 2001
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Vikram Cement

Respondent

Cce, Indore

Excerpt

1. as per order dated 26.3.2001 passed in the stay application, this tribunal found that the issue in the appeal was squarely covered against the appellants by a larger bench decision of the tribunal and, therefore, in the absence of prima facie case, directed the appellants to deposit an amount of rs. 1,26,651/- towards duty on or before 8.5.2001 for purpose of section 35f of the central excise act. the bench, however, granted waiver of deposit of penalty. today the matter has come up for reporting compliance with the direction for deposit.there is neither any report of compliance nor representation for the appellants inspite of notice of the above order. the respondents is represented by ld. jdr, sh. j. singh.2. it appears from the proceedings on record that the appellants are not interested in pursuing this appeal. the appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution as well as for non-compliance with the provisions of section 35f ibid.

Full Judgment

1. As per Order dated 26.3.2001 passed in the stay application, this Tribunal found that the issue in the appeal was squarely covered against the appellants by a Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal and, therefore, in the absence of prima facie case, directed the appellants to deposit an amount of Rs. 1,26,651/- towards duty on or before 8.5.2001 for purpose of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Bench, however, granted waiver of deposit of penalty. Today the matter has come up for reporting compliance with the direction for deposit.

There is neither any report of compliance nor representation for the appellants inspite of notice of the above order. The respondents is represented by ld. JDR, Sh. J. Singh.

2. It appears from the proceedings on record that the appellants are not interested in pursuing this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution as well as for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F ibid.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties M/S. Vikram Cement vs Cce, Indore Same Subject Service Tax