Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.C.E., Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Vardhman Spg. and General Mills

C.C.E., Chandigarh vs M/S. Vardhman Spg. and General Mills

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 11, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22952

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E., Chandigarh

Respondent

M/S. Vardhman Spg. and General Mills

Excerpt

1. the revenue has filed two appeals out of single order in appeal no.1709 dated 30.9.99. the period in dispute is october 94, december 94 and amount in dispute is rs. 98,238/-. since there is only one order in appeal and only one order in review relating to the above period, ld.counsel for the respondent is correct in his submission that one appeal alone is necessary. therefore, appeal no. e/133 of 2000 is not required and dismissed as duplication. i shall proceed to dispose of appeal no.e 86/2000-nb.2. commissioner has extended modvat credit on items such as electric panel, weighing scales etc. on the ground that they are capital goods, eligible for modvat credit under rule 57q of the central excise rules.function and use of items as set out by the lower appellate authority and not contested by the revenue in its appeal (sic)memorandum is shown below:-1. electric panel it is used in the production department in order to provide2. weighing scales it help processing department and parts thereof. to manufacture goods and very much used in relation to3. processing materials are carried in the trolly processing trolly from one machine to the other. these4.fibre glass it is used in humidification plant. this plant is essential maintained in processing block of spinning mill. fibre glass is5. gauge it is essential spare required in spinning mill. it is being6. heater it is an apparatus which is used for conditioning of yarn. hence, eligible to be covered under 3. it has been held that in a series of decisions of the tribunal including decision of the larger bench in the case of jawahar mills vs cce coimbatore 1999(109) elt 47 that items of the above kind are capital goods covered by rule 57q, hence eligible to modvat credit.following ratio of the above cited decision, i hold that there is no infirmity in the impugned order and accordingly uphold the same and reject the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The Revenue has filed two appeals out of single order in appeal No.1709 dated 30.9.99. The period in dispute is October 94, December 94 and amount in dispute is Rs. 98,238/-. Since there is only one order in appeal and only one order in review relating to the above period, Ld.

Counsel for the respondent is correct in his submission that one appeal alone is necessary. Therefore, appeal No. E/133 of 2000 is not required and dismissed as duplication. I shall proceed to dispose of appeal No.E 86/2000-NB.2. Commissioner has extended modvat credit on items such as electric panel, weighing scales etc. on the ground that they are capital goods, eligible for modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.

Function and use of items as set out by the lower appellate authority and not contested by the Revenue in its appeal (SIC)memorandum is shown below:-1. Electric Panel It is used in the production department in order to provide2. Weighing Scales It help processing department and parts thereof. to manufacture goods and very much used in relation to3. Processing Materials are carried in the Trolly processing trolly from one machine to the other. These4.Fibre Glass It is used in humidification plant. This plant is essential maintained in processing block of spinning mill. Fibre Glass is5. Gauge It is essential spare required in spinning mill. It is being6. Heater It is an apparatus which is used for conditioning of yarn. Hence, eligible to be covered under 3. It has been held that in a series of decisions of the Tribunal including decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Jawahar Mills Vs CCE Coimbatore 1999(109) ELT 47 that items of the above kind are capital goods covered by Rule 57Q, hence eligible to modvat credit.

Following ratio of the above cited decision, I hold that there is no infirmity in the impugned order and accordingly uphold the same and reject the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial