M/S. Arsh Casting (P) Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Chandigarh

M/S. Arsh Casting (P) Ltd. vs C.C.E. Chandigarh

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 10, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/22921
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: May 10, 2001
Subject: Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Company

Key legal issue: Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S. Arsh Casting (P) Ltd.

Respondent

C.C.E. Chandigarh

Excerpt

2. the appellants filed an appeal before the commissioner (appeals) against the adjudication order and the appeal was dismissed vide impugned order for non-compliance to the provisions of sec. 35 f of the act. the commissioner (appeals) has not dealt with the appeal on merits. against this order, the appellants filed an appeal before the tribunal and the tribunal vide stay order directed the appellants to deposit a sum of 50,000.00 for hearing of the appeal. the appellants have fully complied with the stay order.3. the commissioner (appeals), in the impugned order, had not dealt with the merits of the case. therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the commissioner (appeals) for deciding afresh. the appeal is disposed of by way of remand. (dictated in court).

Full Judgment

2. The appellants filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the adjudication order and the appeal was dismissed vide impugned order for non-compliance to the provisions of Sec. 35 F of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) has not dealt with the appeal on merits. Against this order, the appellants filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal vide Stay Order directed the appellants to deposit a sum of 50,000.00 for hearing of the appeal. The appellants have fully complied with the stay order.

3. The Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, had not dealt with the merits of the case. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding afresh. The appeal is disposed of by way of remand. (Dictated in Court).

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties M/S. Arsh Casting (P) Ltd. vs C.C.E. Chandigarh Same Subject Company