Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Cen. Excise, Vs. M/S. N.C. Industries

Commissioner of Cen. Excise, vs M/S. N.C. Industries

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided May 01, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22665

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Respondent

M/S. N.C. Industries

Excerpt

the contest made in this appeal from the revenue is of the benefit given to the scrap arising out of the manufacture of steel containers from sheets, plates etc, in terms of sr.no.30(ii) of notfn.171/88ce. in holding for the assessee, the commissioner relied upon his earlier order which was not challenged by the department.2. we find that the same issue stands covered by the judgment of the larger bench in the case of universal containers vs. cce [2000 (120) e.l.t.538(tri-lb). the tribunal in this judgement observed that the waste was the result of process of cutting, punching etc. of sheets, coils etc. and not from the goods manufactured as a result of these operations. on this observation, the tribunal extended the benefit of the said entry. on this observation, the tribunal extended the benefit of the said entry. the facts being identical in the present case, the ratio of this judgement squarely applies. the order of the commissioner (appeals) is upheld. the appeal from the revenue is dismissed.

Full Judgment

The contest made in this appeal from the Revenue is of the benefit given to the scrap arising out of the manufacture of steel containers from sheets, plates etc, in terms of sr.no.30(ii) of Notfn.171/88CE. In holding for the assessee, the Commissioner relied upon his earlier order which was not challenged by the department.

2. We find that the same issue stands covered by the judgment of the Larger Bench in the case of Universal Containers vs. CCE [2000 (120) E.L.T.538(Tri-LB). The Tribunal in this judgement observed that the waste was the result of process of cutting, punching etc. of sheets, coils etc. and not from the goods manufactured as a result of these operations. On this observation, the Tribunal extended the benefit of the said entry. On this observation, the Tribunal extended the benefit of the said entry. The facts being identical in the present case, the ratio of this judgement squarely applies. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is upheld. The appeal from the Revenue is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial