Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C.C.E., Patna Vs. M/S Bihar Caustic and Chemicals Ltd.

C.C.E., Patna vs M/S Bihar Caustic and Chemicals Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta Decided Apr 16, 2001
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/22145

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E., Patna

Respondent

M/S Bihar Caustic and Chemicals Ltd.

Excerpt

1. the issue involved in the present appeal of the revenue if as regards the admissibility of modvat credit in respect m.s.nuts and bolts and pvc sieve.2. we have heard both sides duly represented by shri v.k. chaturvedi, learned sdr for the revenue and shri s.k. bagharia, learned advocate for the respondent.3. we find that the issue as regards the modvat credit in respect of nuts and bolts had already been covered by the earlier decision of the tribunal when an appeal filed by the revenue against the same respondent was dismissed vide order no.a-1007/cal/99 dated 17.8.99. as such, following the ratio of the earlier order we confirm the order of the commissioner (appeals) allowing the modvat credit in respect of nuts and bolts.4. as regards the credit in respect of pvc sieve is concerned it is seen that the same is a filtering element. it is installed in the brine filter equipment machine at the respondent's factory. it is a part/component of the said equipment /machine and facilittes screening of brine which is a necessary part of the process of manufacture.brine filter equipment machine is covered by heading no.84.19 and accordingly, its parts/accessories/components were clearly covered by the definition of capital goods.5. our attention had also been drawn by shri s.k. bagaria, learned advocate to the board's circular datd 2.12.96 clarifying that parts and components need for be covered by the chapter mentioned under rule 57q defining the capital goods. clause (d) of explanation 1 to rule 57q defines parts, spares and accessories do specified items from (a) to (c) as capital goods.inasmuch as the pv sieves in question are parts do brine filter equipment which is covered by heading 84.19 which against is a specified heading covered by the definition of capital goods. we do not find any justification for not allowing modvat credit in respect of pv sieves. in view of the foregoing, no merits are found in the revenue's ahead and the same is accordingly rejected.

Full Judgment

1. The issue involved in the present appeal of the Revenue if as regards the admissibility of modvat credit in respect M.S.Nuts and Bolts and PVC Sieve.

2. We have heard both sides duly represented by Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, learned SDR for the Revenue and Shri S.K. Bagharia, learned Advocate for the respondent.

3. We find that the issue as regards the modvat credit in respect of Nuts and Bolts had already been covered by the earlier decision of the Tribunal when an appeal filed by the Revenue against the same respondent was dismissed vide Order No.A-1007/Cal/99 dated 17.8.99. As such, following the ratio of the earlier order we confirm the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing the modvat credit in respect of Nuts and Bolts.

4. As regards the credit in respect of PVC Sieve is concerned it is seen that the same is a filtering element. It is installed in the brine filter equipment machine at the respondent's factory. It is a part/component of the said equipment /machine and facilittes screening of brine which is a necessary part of the process of manufacture.Brine filter equipment machine is covered by Heading No.84.19 and accordingly, its parts/accessories/components were clearly covered by the definition of capital goods.

5. Our attention had also been drawn by Shri S.K. Bagaria, learned Advocate to the Board's Circular datd 2.12.96 clarifying that parts and components need for be covered by the Chapter mentioned under Rule 57Q defining the capital goods. Clause (d) of Explanation 1 to Rule 57Q defines parts, spares and accessories do specified items from (a) to (c) as capital goods.Inasmuch as the PV Sieves in question are parts do brine filter equipment which is covered by heading 84.19 which against is a specified heading covered by the definition of capital goods. We do not find any justification for not allowing modvat credit in respect of PV sieves. In view of the foregoing, no merits are found in the revenue's ahead and the same is accordingly rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial