Shree Cement Vs. Cce, Jaipur

Shree Cement vs Cce, Jaipur

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Apr 03, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/21943

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/21943
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: Apr 03, 2001
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shree Cement

Respondent

Cce, Jaipur

Legal References

Reported In: (2001)(137)ELT408TriDel

Excerpt

2. ld. advocate sh. shekhar vyas, reiterating the prayer in these applications, pleads that complete waiver of pre-deposit of the duty and penalty amounts and stay of recovery thereof may be granted, pending the appeal. i have also heard ld. jdr, sh. a.k. jain.3. as regards the prayer for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounts, these applications will have to wait for the decision of larger bench on the issue referred from the case of k.s. chini mills [appeal no. e/2032/97-nb(s)]. regarding the prayer for stay of recovery, though the same cannot be granted under section 35f of the central excise act at this stage, i am inclined to direct, under rule 41 of the cegat (procedure) rule, 1982, that no departmental coercive action shall be taken to recover the aforesaid amounts or any part thereof during the pendency of these applications. these applications are posted to 26.6.2001.

Full Judgment

2. Ld. Advocate Sh. Shekhar Vyas, reiterating the prayer in these applications, pleads that complete waiver of pre-deposit of the duty and penalty amounts and stay of recovery thereof may be granted, pending the appeal. I have also heard ld. JDR, sh. A.K. Jain.

3. As regards the prayer for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounts, these applications will have to wait for the decision of Larger Bench on the issue referred from the case of K.S. Chini Mills [Appeal No. E/2032/97-NB(S)]. Regarding the prayer for stay of recovery, though the same cannot be granted under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act at this stage, I am inclined to direct, under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rule, 1982, that no departmental coercive action shall be taken to recover the aforesaid amounts or any part thereof during the pendency of these applications. These applications are posted to 26.6.2001.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Shree Cement vs Cce, Jaipur Same Subject Service Tax