Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Raj Cement, Beawar (Raj)

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Raj Cement, Beawar (Raj)

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 22, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/21664

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Raj Cement, Beawar (Raj)

Excerpt

1. ld. sdr shri mewa singh, submits that the revenue did not want to pursue the appeal and wishes to withdraw the same. therefore, the appeal of the revenue is order to be dismissed as withdrawn.

Full Judgment

1. Ld. SDR Shri Mewa Singh, submits that the Revenue did not want to pursue the appeal and wishes to withdraw the same. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue is order to be dismissed as withdrawn.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial