Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Pranav Paper Mills

Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Pranav Paper Mills

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Feb 23, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/21074

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/21074
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On: Feb 23, 2001
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise,

Respondent

M/S. Pranav Paper Mills

Excerpt

1. in spite of notice issued twice, the commissioner has not cared to rectify the defects. shri b.k. choubey wants some more time. i cannot agree to that. once i can tolerate the mistake being committed. twice it cannot be tolerated. hence appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of rule 11 of the cegat (procedure) rules, 1982.

Full Judgment

1. In spite of notice issued twice, the Commissioner has not cared to rectify the defects. Shri B.K. Choubey wants some more time. I cannot agree to that. Once I can tolerate the mistake being committed. Twice it cannot be tolerated. Hence appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Commissioner of Central Excise, vs M/S. Pranav Paper Mills Same Subject Land Acquisition