Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

C.C.E., Indore Vs. M/S. Cement Corporation of India

C.C.E., Indore vs M/S. Cement Corporation of India

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 02, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/20692

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E., Indore

Respondent

M/S. Cement Corporation of India

Excerpt

1. this revenue appeal was dismissed vide final order dt. 26.6.2000 of the cegat on account of the revenue not obtaining the clearance from the committee of secretaries to proceed with the matter as the respondents are a public sector undertaking.2. the present rom petition is filed by the revenue praying for the liberty to revive their appeal as and when the clearance certificate is produced by them.3. i have heard shri k. panchatcharm, jdr for the revenue and shri gautam acharya, advocate for the respondents. the ld. counsel for the respondents very fairly stated that he has no objection if the order dt. 26.6.2000 is modified as per the request of the department.consequently, the following modification is ordered in the aforesaid order of the tribunal.after the sentence - "thus the appeal is dismissed" - the following should be added - "with the liberty to revive the same as and when the clearance certificate from the committee of secretaries is produced".

Full Judgment

1. This Revenue appeal was dismissed vide Final Order dt. 26.6.2000 of the CEGAT on account of the Revenue not obtaining the clearance from the Committee of Secretaries to proceed with the matter as the Respondents are a Public Sector Undertaking.

2. The present ROM Petition is filed by the Revenue praying for the liberty to revive their appeal as and when the clearance certificate is produced by them.

3. I have heard Shri K. Panchatcharm, JDR for the Revenue and Shri Gautam Acharya, Advocate for the Respondents. The ld. Counsel for the Respondents very fairly stated that he has no objection if the Order dt. 26.6.2000 is modified as per the request of the Department.

Consequently, the following modification is ordered in the aforesaid Order of the Tribunal.

After the sentence - "Thus the appeal is dismissed" - the following should be added - "with the liberty to revive the same as and when the clearance certificate from the Committee of Secretaries is produced".

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties C.C.E., Indore vs M/S. Cement Corporation of India Same Subject Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous Public sector undertaking final order

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales