Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sh. Pyare Lal Vs. C.C., Amritsar

Sh. Pyare Lal vs C.C., Amritsar

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 04, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/20249

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sh. Pyare Lal

Respondent

C.C., Amritsar

Excerpt

1. when the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellant.the tribunal vide order no. s/796/00-nb (s) dated 9.11.2000 directed the appellant to deposit a sum of rs. 50,000/- for hearing of the appeal. the appellant has not produced any evidence to show that he has complied with the stay order. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance to the provisions of sec. 129 of the customs act act.(dictated in court).

Full Judgment

1. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellant.

The Tribunal vide order No. S/796/00-NB (S) dated 9.11.2000 directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/- for hearing of the appeal. The appellant has not produced any evidence to show that he has complied with the Stay Order. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance to the provisions of Sec. 129 of the Customs Act Act.

(Dictated in Court).

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial