Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce, Chandigarh Vs. M/S. Diamond Steel Rolling Mills

Cce, Chandigarh vs M/S. Diamond Steel Rolling Mills

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 08, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/19966

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce, Chandigarh

Respondent

M/S. Diamond Steel Rolling Mills

Excerpt

1. in this reference application filed under sub-section i of section 35 g of central excise act 1944 the revenue has sought the reference of the following question to the high court: "whether gate passes issued prior to 1.4.94 but endorsed on or after that date would fall under the coverage of entry no.10 in the table to the notification no.16/94-ce (nt) dated 30.3.94 and would consequently became eligible documents for taking credit under the modvat scheme?" 2. the learned dr stated that the issue sought to be referred in this case has already been referred (to bombay high court in the case of m/s. moosa haji patra wala pvt. ltd. and to chandigarh high court in the jindal steels case). as the issue is already under reference to the high courts this reference application also is allowed.

Full Judgment

1. In this reference application filed under sub-section I of Section 35 G of Central Excise Act 1944 the Revenue has sought the reference of the following question to the High Court: "Whether gate passes issued prior to 1.4.94 but endorsed on or after that date would fall under the coverage of Entry No.10 in the table to the Notification No.16/94-CE (NT) dated 30.3.94 and would consequently became eligible documents for taking credit under the Modvat Scheme?" 2. The learned DR stated that the issue sought to be referred in this case has already been referred (to Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Moosa Haji Patra Wala Pvt. Ltd. and to Chandigarh High Court in the Jindal Steels case). As the issue is already under reference to the High Courts this reference application also is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial