Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Singla Steels Ltd.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Singla Steels Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Nov 03, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/19641

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Singla Steels Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2001)(127)ELT562TriDel

Excerpt

1. in this appeal filed by the revenue the issue involved is whether runners and risers emerging during the process of manufacture of ingots are eligible for exemption from payment of duty under notification no.49/97-ce dated 1-8-97 as waste and scrap.2. when the matter was called no one was present on behalf of the m/s.singla steels ltd., nor there was any request for adjournment. shri a.k. jain, learned d.r., mentioned that the issue involved in this appeal has already been decided by the tribunal in the case of cce, chandigarh v. k.c. alloys and ors., final order no. 1450-1493/2000-b dated 26-9-2000. he also mentioned that he reiterates the grounds mentioned in the memorandum of appeal and relies on the decision in the case of vishwakarma steel industries ltd. v. cce, 1986 (26) e.l.t. 126 (t).3. we have considered the submissions of both the sides. the issue involved in the present appeal stands settled by the tribunal in the case of cce, chandigarh v. k.c. alloys and ors., supra. it was held in the said case as under :- "applying the ratio of all the decisions discussed earlier and the fact that the notification exempts waste and scrap when such waste and scrap arises in the course of manufacture of ingots and billets of non-alloy in all induction furnace unit on which duty of excise is paid under section 3a of the act, the benefit of exemption cannot be denied to the runners and risers in question as they squarely fall within the ambit of notification no. 49/97-ce." 4. following this decision we hold that the exemption under notification no. 49/97 is available to runners and risers which emerge during the process of manufacture of ingots in a unit where the duty liability is discharged under section 3a of the central excise act.accordingly all the appeals filed by the revenue are rejected.

Full Judgment

1. In this appeal filed by the Revenue the issue involved is whether runners and risers emerging during the process of manufacture of ingots are eligible for exemption from payment of duty under Notification No.49/97-CE dated 1-8-97 as waste and scrap.

2. When the matter was called no one was present on behalf of the M/s.

Singla Steels Ltd., nor there was any request for adjournment. Shri A.K. Jain, learned D.R., mentioned that the issue involved in this appeal has already been decided by the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Chandigarh v. K.C. Alloys and Ors., Final Order No. 1450-1493/2000-B dated 26-9-2000. He also mentioned that he reiterates the grounds mentioned in the memorandum of appeal and relies on the decision in the case of Vishwakarma Steel Industries Ltd. v. CCE, 1986 (26) E.L.T. 126 (T).

3. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. The issue involved in the present appeal stands settled by the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Chandigarh v. K.C. Alloys and Ors., supra. It was held in the said case as under :- "Applying the ratio of all the decisions discussed earlier and the fact that the Notification exempts waste and scrap when such waste and scrap arises in the course of manufacture of ingots and billets of non-alloy in all induction furnace unit on which duty of excise is paid under Section 3A of the Act, the benefit of exemption cannot be denied to the runners and risers in question as they squarely fall within the ambit of notification No. 49/97-CE." 4. Following this decision we hold that the exemption under Notification No. 49/97 is available to runners and risers which emerge during the process of manufacture of ingots in a unit where the duty liability is discharged under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act.

Accordingly all the appeals filed by the Revenue are rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial