Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Grace Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs

Grace Enterprises vs Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Oct 20, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/19500

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Grace Enterprises

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(2001)(127)ELT160Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. on the submission made by the advocate for the appellant that, he only wishes to raise the ground relating to the quantum of redemption fine and no other aspect of the matter, with the consent of the departmental representative, the appeal has been taken up for disposal.2. in the impugned order, the commissioner has found the declared value of the consignment of assorted consumer goods imported by the appellant, such as toasters, calculators etc. valued at rs. 7.81 lacs was far too low and enhanced the value to rs. 25.65 lacs. he has ordered confiscation of the goods under clause (m) of section 111 of the act and given the importer an option to redeem them on payment of fine of rs. 9.00 lacs.3. the plea advanced in support of the prayer for reduction of the redemption fine is that the goods have been under detention by the customs from may, 2000 till now after they were imported in may. the show cause notice was issued in july, replied to the notice on the next day and the matter adjudicated five days later. it is contended that in view of the long storage, there has been drop in the value of the goods. the loss caused to the appellant as a result of the capital being tied up and the detention charge incurred is around rs. 1.50 lacs and the goods in question imported under the provisions of the open general licence.4. the departmental representative points out that the redemption fine imposed is only about 30% of the value and does not call for any further reduction.5. taking note of the demurrage charges incurred by the appellant, and the other factors claimed, we reduce the fine from rs. 9.00 lacs to rs. 7.00 lacs.

Full Judgment

1. On the submission made by the advocate for the appellant that, he only wishes to raise the ground relating to the quantum of redemption fine and no other aspect of the matter, with the consent of the departmental representative, the appeal has been taken up for disposal.

2. In the impugned order, the Commissioner has found the declared value of the consignment of assorted consumer goods imported by the appellant, such as toasters, calculators etc. valued at Rs. 7.81 lacs was far too low and enhanced the value to Rs. 25.65 lacs. He has ordered confiscation of the goods under Clause (m) of Section 111 of the Act and given the importer an option to redeem them on payment of fine of Rs. 9.00 lacs.

3. The plea advanced in support of the prayer for reduction of the redemption fine is that the goods have been under detention by the Customs from May, 2000 till now after they were imported in May. The show cause notice was issued in July, replied to the notice on the next day and the matter adjudicated five days later. It is contended that in view of the long storage, there has been drop in the value of the goods. The loss caused to the appellant as a result of the capital being tied up and the detention charge incurred is around Rs. 1.50 lacs and the goods in question imported under the provisions of the Open General Licence.

4. The departmental representative points out that the redemption fine imposed is only about 30% of the value and does not call for any further reduction.

5. Taking note of the demurrage charges incurred by the appellant, and the other factors claimed, we reduce the fine from Rs. 9.00 lacs to Rs. 7.00 lacs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial