Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Raj Wire Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Raj Wire Industries Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 04, 2000
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/19311

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Wire Industries Ltd.

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2001)(94)LC507Tri(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. the appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 27.8.1999.2. in this case the benefit of modvat credit was denied to the appellants on the rejected goods received by them from buyers on payment of duty.4. in this case show cause notice was issued to the appellants denying the benefit of modvat credit on tin copper wire, which was cleared bv them on payment of duty and their buyers, thereafter, again on payment of duty, returned the wire as defective to the appellants. in the show cause notice, the allegation against the appellants is that they cannot take credit on the tin copper wire as the tin copper wire was the final product. the issue in respect of taking the modvat credit is decided by the larger bench of the tribunal in the case of cce v. tin mfg. co.reported in 2000 (39) rlt 197. in this case the tribunal held that returned defective goods to be treated as eligible inputs as the same were subjected to the process of manufacture. the another larger bench of the tribunal in the case of cce v. bhushan steel & strips ltd. reported in 2000 (39) rlt 200 had also taken the same view.5. in view of the above decisions of the tribunal, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with law. (dictated in court).

Full Judgment

1. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 27.8.1999.

2. In this case the benefit of modvat credit was denied to the appellants on the rejected goods received by them from buyers on payment of duty.

4. In this case show cause notice was issued to the appellants denying the benefit of modvat credit on tin copper wire, which was cleared bv them on payment of duty and their buyers, thereafter, again on payment of duty, returned the wire as defective to the appellants. In the show cause notice, the allegation against the appellants is that they cannot take credit on the tin copper wire as the tin copper wire was the final product. The issue in respect of taking the modvat credit is decided by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CCE v. Tin Mfg. Co.

reported in 2000 (39) RLT 197. In this case the Tribunal held that returned defective goods to be treated as eligible inputs as the same were subjected to the process of manufacture. The another larger bench of the Tribunal in the case of CCE v. Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd. reported in 2000 (39) RLT 200 had also taken the same view.

5. In view of the above decisions of the Tribunal, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with law. (Dictated in Court).

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial