Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shajahan vs Abdul Razack

Shajahan vs Abdul Razack

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 17, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1922901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/2564/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shajahan

Respondent

Abdul Razack

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sunil thomas wednesday, the 17th day of july 2019 / 26th ashadha, 1941 op(c).no.2564 of 2014 against the order/judgment in os 317/2011 of sub court, ottappalam petitioner:shajahan aged 44 years s/o.muhammedkunhu, kappil house, vattamkannapurath, edathanattukara amsom, desom, palakkad district by adv. sri.jacob sebastian respondent: abdul razack s/o.venkitacholakkaparambil mohammed, edathanattukara amsom desom, palakkad district,pin 678 582. by advs. sri.p.b.krishnan sri.r.sreehari this op (civil) having been finally heard on 17.07.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:judgmentwhen the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original petition is not pressed. this is recorded. hence, original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- sunil thomas sbna judge appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 exhibit p1 copy of the plaint in o.s.no.317/2011 of the court of the exhibit p2 exhibit p2 copy of the written statement in os no.317/2011 of the court of the exhibit p3 exhibit p3 copy of the issued framed in os no. 317/2011 of the court of the surbodinate judge of ottapalam exhibit p4 exhibit p4 copy of the orer dated subordinage judge of ottapalam in original suit numnber 317/2011 exhibit p5 exhibit p5 copy of the agreement dated

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 26TH ASHADHA, 1941 OP(C).No.2564 of 2014 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 317/2011 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONER:

SHAJAHAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMEDKUNHU, KAPPIL HOUSE, VATTAMKANNAPURATH, EDATHANATTUKARA AMSOM, DESOM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT: ABDUL RAZACK S/O.VENKITACHOLAKKAPARAMBIL MOHAMMED, EDATHANATTUKARA AMSOM DESOM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,PIN 678 582. BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SREEHARI THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original petition is not pressed. This is recorded. Hence, original petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS Sbna JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.317/2011 OF THE COURT OF THE EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO.317/2011 OF THE COURT OF THE EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE ISSUED FRAMED IN OS NO. 317/2011 OF THE COURT OF THE SURBODINATE JUDGE OF OTTAPALAM EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE ORER DATED SUBORDINAGE JUDGE OF OTTAPALAM IN ORIGINAL SUIT NUMNBER 317/2011 EXHIBIT P5 EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial