Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.Vishnu Vs N.Shruthi

A.Vishnu vs N.Shruthi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided May 09, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1922824

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
A/2094/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Vishnu

Respondent

N.Shruthi

Excerpt

.....is notinterested in visiting the child in the respondent's home and was insisting for production of child in public places, the counsel further submitted that as the child was barely 4 years old, it is not advisable to produce the child in public places like beach or park due to the hot climate and so, the applicant should be directed to visit the child only in the respondent's home. the counsel submitted that the respondent would not obstruct the applicant from visiting the child in her home.4. heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.5. under the facts and circumstances and in light of the undertaking given by the learnedcounsel for the respondent, that the respondent/mother will not obstruct the applicant from visiting and spending time with the minor child in her house, a direction is issued to the respondent/mother to permit the applicant to visit the child minor anirudh krishnan, for three hours on monday, wednesday and friday in the respondent's residence at no.9/1c, 1st floor, burkit road, t.nagar, chennai - 600 017 starting from 12.05.2025. the respondent is directed not to disturb the child during such visitation by the applicant. it is made clear that this arrangement is made only for the summer vacation.6. accordingly, this application is ordered.7. post the main original petition on 10.06.2025. 09-05-2025 to1. n.shruthid/o.s.narayanan, no.53 and 55, flat no.3c, the point apartment, five furlong road, maduvinkarai, guindy, chennai - 600 032. also at no.9/1c, 1st floor, burkit road, t.nagar, thiyagaraya nagar, chennai - 600 017.n.mala, j.in o.p.no.241 of 2025 09.05.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-05-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE N. MALA in O.P.No.241 of 2025 A.Vishnu S/o.B.Anantharamakrishnan, No.62, Jayam Illam, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. Applicant(s) Vs N.Shruthi D/o.S.Narayanan, No.53 and 55, Flat No.3C, The Point Apartment, Five Furlong Road, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. also at No.9/1C, 1st Floor, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.J.Ravikumar For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Arul Gnana Prakash

ORDER

This application has been filed to direct the respondent/wife to produce the minor Anirudh Krishnan, and to grant temporary custody of the minor to the applicant/husband or to provide visitation rights to the applicant on such terms this Court deems fit.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent/mother submitted that the respondent has never

obstructed the applicant from visiting the child. He further submitted that the applicant/father is at liberty to visit the child and the respondent will not obstruct the applicant from visiting the child.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent further submitted that applicant/father is not

interested in visiting the child in the respondent's home and was insisting for production of child in public places, the counsel further submitted that as the child was barely 4 years old, it is not advisable to produce the child in public places like beach or park due to the hot climate and so, the applicant should be directed to visit the child only in the respondent's home. The counsel submitted that the respondent would not obstruct the applicant from visiting the child in her home.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

5. Under the facts and circumstances and in light of the undertaking given by the learned

counsel for the respondent, that the respondent/mother will not obstruct the applicant from visiting and spending time with the minor child in her house, a direction is issued to the respondent/mother to permit the applicant to visit the child Minor Anirudh Krishnan, for three hours on Monday, Wednesday and Friday in the respondent's residence at No.9/1C, 1st Floor, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017 starting from 12.05.2025. The respondent is directed not to disturb the child during such visitation by the applicant. It is made clear that this arrangement is made only for the summer vacation.

6. Accordingly, this application is ordered.

7. Post the main original petition on 10.06.2025. 09-05-2025 To

1. N.Shruthi

D/o.S.Narayanan, No.53 and 55, Flat No.3C, The Point Apartment, Five Furlong Road, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. also at No.9/1C, 1st Floor, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

N.MALA, J.

in O.P.No.241 of 2025 09.05.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial