Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Marakka vs the State of Karnataka

Marakka vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1922739

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/16307/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Marakka

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice r devdas writ petition no. 16307 of 2021 (klr-res) between: marakka aged about 93 years w/o. late. mallakkanna thimmaiah, r/at thimmegowda doddi, harisandra, kasaba hobli, ramanagara taluk, ramanagara district 562159 …petitioner (by sri. ananda c., advocate for sri. s d n prasad, advocate)and: digitally signed by dharmalingam 1. the state of karnataka location: high rep by its secretary, court of karnataka revenue department, ms building, dr. ambedkar road, bangalore 5600012. the deputy commissoner -2-3. the assisant director of land records ramanagar taluk and district,4. the assistant commissioner ramanagar sub division,5. the executive officer taluk panchayath, ramanagara taluk and district- 5621596. the tahsildar …respondents (by sri.seshu v., hcgp for r1 to r4 & r6) this w.p. is filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the letter /order dtd. 25.06.2021 at annx-a and b whereby, the r5 has sought the r-3 and 6 to survey the land and fixthe boundary in respect of the survey no.322 measuring 20 guntas and 1 acre 32 guntas of harisandra village, ramanagar taluk and district and etc., this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: -3-orderr.devdas j., (oral): learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 01.02.2024 seeking leave of this court to withdraw the writ petition.2. the memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.3. accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge jt/- ct: jl

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 16307 OF 2021 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MARAKKA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS W/O. LATE. MALLAKKANNA THIMMAIAH, R/AT THIMMEGOWDA DODDI, HARISANDRA, KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562159 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA C., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S D N PRASAD, ADVOCATE)

AND: Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Location: HIGH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, COURT OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE 560001

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSONER -2-

3. THE ASSISANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS RAMANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT,

4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGAR SUB DIVISION,

5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT- 562159

6. THE TAHSILDAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4 & R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER /

ORDER DTD. 25.06.2021 AT ANNX-A AND B WHEREBY, THE R5 HAS SOUGHT THE R-3 AND 6 TO SURVEY THE LAND AND FIX

THE BOUNDARY IN RESPECT OF THE SURVEY NO.322 MEASURING 20 GUNTAS AND 1 ACRE 32 GUNTAS OF HARISANDRA VILLAGE, RAMANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: -3-

ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL): Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 01.02.2024 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE JT/- CT: JL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial