Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nripan Raja vs Lekshmi

Nripan Raja vs Lekshmi

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 02, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1921806

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/321/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nripan Raja

Respondent

Lekshmi

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k.harilal & the honourable mrs. justice annie john monday, the 02nd day of september 2019 / 11th bhadra, 1941 against the order dated 13-05-2019 in i.a.no.1316/2019 in op (g&w) no. 1294/2017 of family court, kollam petitioner/ petitioner/ petitioner :nripan raja, aged 30 years, s/o. rajasekhar, no. 48, 5th cross street, balakrishnanagar, gerugampakkam, chennai - 600 122 by advs. sri.shabu sreedharan sri.m.yohannan smt.reshma abdul rasheed shri. anoop p.r. keerthi jayanandhan respondent/ respondent/ respondent : lekshmi, aged 25 years, d/o. sreelatha, sreelekshmi veedu, pampuram cherry, parippally, kollam - 691 574 r1 by advs. sri.g.bhagavat singh shri.sundaresan n.k. this op (family court) having been finally heard on 02.09.2019, the court on the same day passed the following:judgmentk.harilal, j.this op (fc) has been filed challenging the order, dismissing the application, filed by the petitioner, seeking interim custody of the child for 30 days from 02.05.2019 to 31.05.2019. obviously, the relief sought for has become infructuous. that apart, it is not disputed that the petitioner has filed a fresh application seeking interim custody of the child during the ensuing onam holidays. in the above view, this op (fc) would stand dismissed as infructuous. k.harilal, judge annie john, judge rkm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 11TH BHADRA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13-05-2019 IN I.A.NO.1316/2019 IN OP (G&W) NO. 1294/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM PETITIONER/ PETITIONER/ PETITIONER :

NRIPAN RAJA, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. RAJASEKHAR, NO. 48, 5TH CROSS STREET, BALAKRISHNANAGAR, GERUGAMPAKKAM, CHENNAI - 600 122 BY ADVS. SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN SRI.M.YOHANNAN SMT.RESHMA ABDUL RASHEED SHRI. ANOOP P.R. KEERTHI JAYANANDHAN RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT : LEKSHMI, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O. SREELATHA, SREELEKSHMI VEEDU, PAMPURAM CHERRY, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM - 691 574 R1 BY ADVS. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH SHRI.SUNDARESAN N.K. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

K.Harilal, J.

This OP (FC) has been filed challenging the order, dismissing the application, filed by the petitioner, seeking interim custody of the child for 30 days from 02.05.2019 to 31.05.2019. Obviously, the relief sought for has become infructuous. That apart, it is not disputed that the petitioner has filed a fresh application seeking interim custody of the child during the ensuing Onam holidays. In the above view, this OP (FC) would stand dismissed as infructuous. K.HARILAL, JUDGE ANNIE JOHN, JUDGE RKM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial