Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramankutty vs Rathi

Ramankutty vs RATHI

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 31, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1920951

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/834/2007

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramankutty

Respondent

RATHI

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday ,the 31st day of january 2019 / 11th magha, 1940 rsa.no. 834 of 2007 against the judgment and decree dated 14.3.2007 in as 25/2003 of principal sub court,thrissur against the judgment and decree dated 3.3.2000 in os 2671/1998 of principal munsiff court,thrissur appellant/first appellant/first appellant: ramankutty,aged 60, s/o. kuyilamparambil manikan, anthikad village, desom, thrissur taluk. by adv. sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondents/respondents 1 and 2 and appellants 2 to 5/defendants 1 and 2 and plaintiffs 2 to 5: 1 rathi, w/o.kallatt asokan, 2 kannan s/o. kallattu ashokan, 3 subramanian s/o. kadukattu kochu, 4 padmini w/o. kuttikattu raghavan, 5 ponni w/o. thiriyedath velayudhan, 6 supreethi d/o. naduparambil raman this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 31.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no. 834 of 2007 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that in spite of earnest effort there was no positive response of the appellant and that there was no instruction from the party. hence, the submission is recorded. appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan, judge pm // true copy // pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY ,THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 11TH MAGHA, 1940 RSA.No. 834 of 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.3.2007 IN AS 25/2003 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 3.3.2000 IN OS 2671/1998 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR APPELLANT/FIRST APPELLANT/FIRST APPELLANT: RAMANKUTTY,AGED 60, S/O. KUYILAMPARAMBIL MANIKAN, ANTHIKAD VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 AND APPELLANTS 2 TO 5/DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2 AND PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 5: 1 RATHI, W/O.KALLATT ASOKAN, 2 KANNAN S/O. KALLATTU ASHOKAN, 3 SUBRAMANIAN S/O. KADUKATTU KOCHU, 4 PADMINI W/O. KUTTIKATTU RAGHAVAN, 5 PONNI W/O. THIRIYEDATH VELAYUDHAN, 6 SUPREETHI D/O. NADUPARAMBIL RAMAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No. 834 of 2007 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that in spite of earnest effort there was no positive response of the appellant and that there was no instruction from the party. Hence, the submission is recorded. Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN, JUDGE pm // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial