Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sridhar vs State of Karnataka

Sridhar vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Nov 06, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1920614

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/1291/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sridhar

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 6th day of november, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice shivashankar amarannavar criminal appeal no. 1291 of 2021 between: sridhar aged 27 years udupi taluk 576105 …appellant (by sri nagaraja reddy d, advocate) and:1. state of karnataka by circle inspector of police udupi circle rep. by spp high court building bangalore 560001 digitally signed by lakshminarayana murthy rajashri location: high2. kum. sugunacourt of aged 22 years karnataka d/o v g prabhu udupi tq 576105 …respondents (by sri k.nagaraja reddy, hcgp for r1 sri renspre prithesh d’souza, advocate for r2) -2- this crl.a is filed under section 374(2) cr.p.c praying to set aside the judgment of conviction dated 28.09.2018 and order of sentence dated 29.09.2018, passed by the principal sessions/special judge, udupi district, udupi, in s.c.no.29/2016,convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under section 376 and 201 of ipc and sec.4 and 6 of pocso act and etc. this appeal, coming on for orders this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice shivashankar amarannavaroral judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. memo reads thus. “the under signed counsel for the appellant herein prays that this hon'ble court be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn, as requested by the appellant by his letter dated 15-06-2024 which is annexed along with memo" -3-2. in view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. pending ia's if any, stands disposed of. sd/- (shivashankar amarannavar) judge kly

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1291 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SRIDHAR AGED 27 YEARS UDUPI TALUK 576105 …APPELLANT (BY SRI NAGARAJA REDDY D, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UDUPI CIRCLE REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE 560001 Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH

2. KUM. SUGUNA

COURT OF AGED 22 YEARS KARNATAKA D/O V G PRABHU UDUPI TQ 576105 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.NAGARAJA REDDY, HCGP FOR R1 SRI RENSPRE PRITHESH D’SOUZA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) -2- THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 28.09.2018 AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 29.09.2018, PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS/SPECIAL JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI, IN S.C.NO.29/2016,

CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 376 AND 201 OF IPC AND SEC.4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. Memo reads thus. “The under signed counsel for the appellant herein prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn, as requested by the appellant by his letter dated 15-06-2024 which is annexed along with memo" -3-

2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending IA's if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE KLY

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial