Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Axis Bank Ltd vs Ashok Kumar

Axis Bank Ltd vs Ashok Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 29, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1920060

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Arb Appln/617/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Axis Bank Ltd

Respondent

Ashok Kumar

Excerpt

m/s.axis bank ltd. ... applicant vs. ashok kumar ... respondenttill date, the vehicle has not been repossessed. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the vehicle could not be located. sufficient opportunity has been granted to the applicant to enable the advocate commissioner to execute the warrant of commission. however, till date, the advocate commissioner could not execute the warrant of commission since the vehicle is not traceable.2. no useful purpose will be served, if this application is allowed to be keptpending. accordingly, this application is closed. however, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner as and when the vehicle is located. while considering the fresh application, this court shall consider retaining the very same advocate commissioner, who has been appointed in this application since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the advocate commissioner.ab ab

Full Judgment

M/s.Axis Bank Ltd. ... Applicant Vs. Ashok Kumar ... Respondent

Till date, the vehicle has not been repossessed. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the vehicle could not be located. Sufficient opportunity has been granted to the applicant to enable the advocate commissioner to execute the warrant of commission. However, till date, the advocate commissioner could not execute the warrant of commission since the vehicle is not traceable.

2. No useful purpose will be served, if this application is allowed to be kept

pending. Accordingly, this application is closed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner as and when the vehicle is located. While considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same advocate commissioner, who has been appointed in this application since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the advocate commissioner.

ab ab

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Axis Bank Ltd vs Ashok Kumar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales