Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Puttegowda vs State of Karnataka

Sri Puttegowda vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 05, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1919555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/11703/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Puttegowda

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 5th day of february, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice sachin shankar magadum writ petition no. 11703 of 2020 (gm-res) between:1. sri. puttegowda s/o. shivanna, aged about 47 years somanahalli, near aps college, 3rd block, bangalore-5600822. sri. k s parveezs/o. sheik ahamed, aged about 45 years, kasi layout, kaggalipura, uttari main road, digitally 3. sri. p narayanappa signed by s/o. late papaiah, albhagya aged about 55 years, location:high no. 54, kunchigarapalya village, court of uttarahalli hobli, karnataka bangalore south taluk,4. sri. anthony swamy s/o. james, aged about 54 years, no. 124, thataguppe village, 1st block, near church, uttarahalli hobli, -2- …petitioners (by sri. jagadeeshachari, advocate) and:1. state of karnataka kaggalipura police station,2. a.shivakumar s/o late anjanappa, kaggalipura village, uttarahalli hobli, bangalore-560082. (impleaded v/o dtd:05.01.2024) …respondents (by smt.prathibha, aga for r1) this wp is filed under articles 226 & 227 of theconstitution of india praying to call for the records from the respondent as per annexure-a dated 17.01.2020 and annexure-b dated 17.01.2020 passed by he respondent in crime no.21/2020 and quash the same. this petition, coming on for admission, this day, the court made the following:orderlearned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. memo is taken on record. -3-2. in view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge alb list no.: 1 sl no.: 18 .

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 11703 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:

1. SRI. PUTTEGOWDA S/O. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SOMANAHALLI, NEAR APS COLLEGE, 3RD BLOCK, BANGALORE-560082

2. SRI. K S PARVEEZ

S/O. SHEIK AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KASI LAYOUT, KAGGALIPURA, UTTARI MAIN ROAD, Digitally 3. SRI. P NARAYANAPPA signed by S/O. LATE PAPAIAH, ALBHAGYA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, Location:

HIGH              NO. 54, KUNCHIGARAPALYA VILLAGE,
COURT OF          UTTARAHALLI HOBLI,
KARNATAKA         BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,

4. SRI. ANTHONY SWAMY S/O. JAMES, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO. 124, THATAGUPPE VILLAGE, 1ST BLOCK, NEAR CHURCH, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, -2- …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADEESHACHARI, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION,

2. A.SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE ANJANAPPA, KAGGALIPURA VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE-560082. (IMPLEADED V/O DTD:05.01.2024) …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRATHIBHA, AGA FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-A DATED 17.01.2020 AND ANNEXURE-B DATED 17.01.2020 PASSED BY HE RESPONDENT IN CRIME NO.21/2020 AND QUASH THE SAME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Memo is taken on record. -3-

2. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial