Krishnakumar Alias Don Vs The State Rep By

Krishnakumar Alias Don vs The State Rep By

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided May 21, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1919441

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1919441
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar
Decided On: May 21, 2025
Case Number: CRL OP/11690/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnakumar Alias Don

Respondent

The State Rep By

Excerpt

.....petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. he would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court and sought for bail. 4.the learned government advocate (crl. side) would reiterate the prosecution case and has filed a counter affidavit and submitted that there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner. page no.2 of 4 5.heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.6.though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was arrested on 11.01.2024, the learned government advocate has filed counter affidavit and submitted that the petitioner was arrayed as a1 and was found in possession of 11.880 grams of ecstasy tablets. as the contraband seized from the accused was commercial quantity, the petitioner is unable to overcome the requirement of section 37 of ndps act. hence, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.7.accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. page no.3 of 4n.senthilkumar, j.to 1.the inspector of of police, 2.central prison ii, puzhal, chennai. 3.the special court under ec and ndps act, chennai. 4.the public prosecutor, madras high court, chennai. page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.05.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
Krishnakumar @ Don .. Petitioner/Accused 1 Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of of Police, (Crime No.897 of 2024) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.897 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan For Respondent : Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
Page No.1 of 4

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) r/w 22(C) and 29(1) of NDPS Act in connection with the case in Crime No.897 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with the other accused, was found in illegal possession of 11.880 grams of Ecstasy. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution case and has filed a counter affidavit and submitted that there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner. Page No.2 of 4 5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was arrested on 11.01.2024, the learned Government Advocate has filed counter affidavit and submitted that the petitioner was arrayed as A1 and was found in possession of 11.880 grams of Ecstasy tablets. As the contraband seized from the accused was commercial quantity, the petitioner is unable to overcome the requirement of Section 37 of NDPS Act. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Page No.3 of 4

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

To 1.The Inspector of of Police, 2.Central Prison II, Puzhal, Chennai. 3.The Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. 4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Page No.4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Krishnakumar Alias Don vs The State Rep By Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar