Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Vidya, Vs K.Kurunthappakumar,

S.Vidya, vs K.Kurunthappakumar,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1918556

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/2029/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Vidya,

Respondent

K.Kurunthappakumar,

Excerpt

.....the records pertaining to sr.no.7504 of 2024 in hmop.no.51 of 2022 from the file of the sub court, tambaram . for petitioner: mr.s.sathiadoss for respondent: no appearanceorderthis revision is also at the instance of the petitioner's wife, who has taken out an application for amendment of hmop no.51 of 2022, seeking to include a relief claiming rs.50 lakhs on the ground of suppression of the factum of impotency of the respondent husband.2. the petition for amendment was lost in the process of the bundlebeing transmitted between the sub court and the district court, and the application was accordingly dismissed. 3.in view of the order passed in tr.cmp no.339 of 2022, this revision is dismissed. however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh application after hmop no.51 of 2022 is transferred to the family court, chennai. there shall be no order as to costs. the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01-07-2025 jrs index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no p.b.balaji,j jrs 1.the sub court, tambaram. 2.k.kurnthappakumar, s/o karuppiah, no.1, 3rd main road, dandeeswaram, vellacherry, chennai. crp no. 2029 of 2025 and cmp no. 11771 of 2025p.b.balaji.,j.sr c.r.p.no.2029 of 2025p.b.balaji.,j.at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter has been taken up today under the caption “for being mentioned”. 2.the matter was disposed of on 01.07.2025. it is brought to the notice of this court that in the order, a typographical error has crept in and the same needs to be corrected.3. registry is directed to carry out the following correction and issue fresh copy to the parties. the first line of the order, the words “petitioner's wife” shall be replaced as “petitioner/wife”.4. the rest of the order shall stand unaltered. 17.07.2025 sr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01-07-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CRP No. 2029 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 11771 OF 2025,

1. S.Vidya, W/o.K.Kurunthappakumar, 17, Shantha Nagar, 3rd Street, 2nd Floor, Sealiyur, Chennai- 600073. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. K.Kurunthappakumar,

S/o.Karuppiah, No.1, 3rd Main Road, Dandeeswaram, Velacherry, Chennai- 600042. Respondent(s) Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records pertaining to SR.No.7504 of 2024 in HMOP.No.51 of 2022 from the file of the Sub Court, Tambaram . For Petitioner: Mr.S.Sathiadoss For Respondent: No appearance

ORDER

This revision is also at the instance of the petitioner's wife, who has taken out an application for amendment of HMOP No.51 of 2022, seeking to include a relief claiming Rs.50 lakhs on the ground of suppression of the factum of impotency of the respondent husband.

2. The petition for amendment was lost in the process of the bundle

being transmitted between the Sub Court and the District Court, and the application was accordingly dismissed. 3.In view of the order passed in Tr.CMP No.339 of 2022, this revision is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh application after HMOP No.51 of 2022 is transferred to the Family Court, Chennai. There shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01-07-2025 jrs Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No P.B.BALAJI,J jrs 1.The Sub court, Tambaram. 2.K.Kurnthappakumar, S/o Karuppiah, No.1, 3rd Main Road, Dandeeswaram, Vellacherry, Chennai. CRP No. 2029 of 2025 AND CMP NO. 11771 OF 2025

P.B.BALAJI.,J.

sr C.R.P.No.2029 of 2025

P.B.BALAJI.,J.

At the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter has been taken up today under the caption “for being mentioned”. 2.The matter was disposed of on 01.07.2025. It is brought to the notice of this Court that in the order, a typographical error has crept in and the same needs to be corrected.

3. Registry is directed to carry out the following correction and issue fresh copy to the parties. The first line of the order, the words “petitioner's wife” shall be replaced as “petitioner/wife”.

4. The rest of the order shall stand unaltered. 17.07.2025 sr

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties S.Vidya, vs K.Kurunthappakumar, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. Balaji

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales