Digambarappa vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1918517

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1918517
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Ravi V Hosmani
Decided On: Jul 01, 2024
Case Number: MSA/141/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Digambarappa

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 1st day of july, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice ravi v hosmani miscellaneous second appeal no. 141 of 2021 (la) between: digambarappa s/o rachegowda aged about 65 years, harohalli village, madihalli hobli, belur taluk, hassan-573115 …appellant (by sri. omkar basava prabhu, advocate (absent)and: state of karnataka by special land acquisition officer, hrp-2, hassan-573201. …respondent digitally signed by geethakumari this msa is filed under section 54(2) of the land parlattaya s acquisition act read with section 105(2) of cpc., location: high court of karnataka against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2020 passed in lac(a).no.342/2016 on the file of the principal district and sessions judge, hassan.,dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgmentand decree dated 22.10.2005 passed in lac.no.242/2001 on the file of the principal civil judge (sr.dn.), hassan, partly allowing the suit filed under section 18(1) of land acquisition act. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day, the court delivered the following: -2-judgmentmatter is listed for orders for non-compliance of office objections for 6th time. though matter was passed over and called again, none appears. office objections are not complied. appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal. accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- judge pmr list no.: 1 sl no.: 13

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2021 (LA) BETWEEN: DIGAMBARAPPA S/O RACHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HAROHALLI VILLAGE, MADIHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN-573115 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. OMKAR BASAVA PRABHU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)

AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HRP-2, HASSAN-573201. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND PARLATTAYA S ACQUISITION ACT READ WITH SECTION 105(2) OF CPC., Location: High Court of Karnataka AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC(A).NO.342/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN.,

DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT

AND DECREE DATED 22.10.2005 PASSED IN LAC.NO.242/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE SUIT FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

Matter is listed for orders for non-compliance of office objections for 6th time. Though matter was passed over and called again, none appears. Office objections are not complied. Appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2024 Same Parties Digambarappa vs State of Karnataka Same Judge Ravi V Hosmani