Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jagadeesan vs the State of Karnataka

Jagadeesan vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1916295

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/6123/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jagadeesan

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of june, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice m.nagaprasanna criminal petition no. 6123 of 2022 between:1. jagadeesan s/o late chinnaswamy aged about 67 years2. rani sw/o jagadeesan aged about 57 years both are residing at no.6/1159, 330d arimuga iyer nagar mummudi, salem tamilnadu - 636112. digitally signed …petitioners by nagaveni location: high (by sri. dayamani s., advocate) court of karnataka and:1. the state of karnataka the station house officer basavanagudi women police station bengaluru rep. by state public prosecutor high court building complex bengaluru - 560001. -2-2. pooja anand w/o dheeban jagadeesan aged about 28 years residing at no.20 1st block, 1st main 1st cross, tyagarajanagar bengaluru - 560028. …respondents this crl.p. is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c praying toallow the petition and quash the entire proceedings in c.c.no.5841/2021 (is arising out of cr.no.56/2020) of basavanagudi women p.s., for the alleged offence p/u/s 498a of ipc pending on the file of the honble xxxvii a.c.m.m, at bengaluru. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderthe case is called twice today. there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners.2. this court on 21.06.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:“though this court has directed that the petition be dismissed in the event office objections would not be complied with, showing indulgence as a last chance, list the matter on 28.06.2024. -3- in the event, office objections are not complied with, no submission will be entertained and the petition would be dismissed." even today, office objections are not complied with. therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. sd/- judge sjk list no.: 1 sl no.: 44

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6123 OF 2022 BETWEEN:

1. JAGADEESAN S/O LATE CHINNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS

2. RANI S

W/O JAGADEESAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.6/1159, 330D ARIMUGA IYER NAGAR MUMMUDI, SALEM TAMILNADU - 636112. Digitally signed …PETITIONERS by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH (BY SRI. DAYAMANI S., ADVOCATE) COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER BASAVANAGUDI WOMEN POLICE STATION BENGALURU REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX BENGALURU - 560001. -2-

2. POOJA ANAND W/O DHEEBAN JAGADEESAN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.20 1ST BLOCK, 1ST MAIN 1ST CROSS, TYAGARAJANAGAR BENGALURU - 560028. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO

ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.5841/2021 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.56/2020) OF BASAVANAGUDI WOMEN P.S., FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 498A OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE XXXVII A.C.M.M, AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The case is called twice today. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. This Court on 21.06.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:

“Though this court has directed that the petition be dismissed in the event office objections would not be complied with, showing indulgence as a last chance, list the matter on 28.06.2024. -3- In the event, office objections are not complied with, no submission will be entertained and the petition would be dismissed." Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial