Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajithkumar vs State of Kerala

Ajithkumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 28, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1914204

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/786/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajithkumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan monday, the 28th day of october 2019 / 6th karthika, 1941 rsa.no.786 of 2006 (b) against the decree & judgment dated 12-01-2006 in as no.1/2002 of district court, kollam against the decree & judgment dated 09-03-2001 in os no.479/1997 of principal munsiff court, kollam appellant/appellant/plaintiff:ajithkumar, s/o kanakarajan, kadapuzha house, meenathucheri, sakthikulangara, kollam. by advs.sri.k.ramachandran smt.r.meera sri.k.mohammed faisal naha smt.reshmi ramkumar respondents/respondents/defendants: 1 state of kerala, represented by district collector, kollam. 2 the tahsildar, revenue recovery, kollam. 3 the executive engineer, neendakara fishing harbour division, harbour engineering department, sathkthikulangara. by government pleader sri. k.p. madhu this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 28.10.2019. the court on the same day delivered the following: r.s.a.no.786 of 2006 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the party in spite of notice. the submission is recorded. the second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan dmr/- judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1941 RSA.No.786 OF 2006 (B) AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 12-01-2006 IN AS No.1/2002 OF DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 09-03-2001 IN OS No.479/1997 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:

AJITHKUMAR, S/o KANAKARAJAN, KADAPUZHA HOUSE, MEENATHUCHERI, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.R.MEERA SRI.K.MOHAMMED FAISAL NAHA SMT.RESHMI RAMKUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2 THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOLLAM. 3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NEENDAKARA FISHING HARBOUR DIVISION, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, SATHKTHIKULANGARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.P. MADHU THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.10.2019. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.S.A.No.786 of 2006 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the party in spite of notice. The submission is recorded. The second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN DMR/- JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial