Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandran vs Devidas

Chandran vs Devidas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 30, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1913932

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/687/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandran

Respondent

Devidas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan wednesday,the 30th day of january 2019 / 10th magha, 1940 against the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2006 in as 152/2003 of additional principal sub court,irinjalakuda against the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2003 in os 1231/2002 of principal munsiff court, irinjalakuda appellant/respondent/plaintiff :- chandran, s/o kallingapuram raman, avittathoor desom and village,mukundapuram taluk, represented by power of attorney ramesh, s/o.lakshmana iyer, sreelakshmi, irinjalakuda po., thrissur dt. by adv. sri.k.g.balasubramanian respondent/appellant/defendant :- devidas s/o vathyatt narayanan, thekkumkara desom, konathukunnu village,, mukundapuram taluk represented by power of attorney, bhagathsingh s/o.elavungal kelan krishnan,, koratty desom, muringoor thekkummury village, this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 30.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the appellant inspite of notice. no steps were taken as ordered by this court. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge sma

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY,THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 10TH MAGHA, 1940 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.03.2006 IN AS 152/2003 of ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.08.2003 IN OS 1231/2002 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF :- CHANDRAN, S/O KALLINGAPURAM RAMAN, AVITTATHOOR DESOM AND VILLAGE,MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY RAMESH, S/O.LAKSHMANA IYER, SREELAKSHMI, IRINJALAKUDA PO., THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT :- DEVIDAS S/O VATHYATT NARAYANAN, THEKKUMKARA DESOM, KONATHUKUNNU VILLAGE,, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY, BHAGATHSINGH S/O.ELAVUNGAL KELAN KRISHNAN,, KORATTY DESOM, MURINGOOR THEKKUMMURY VILLAGE, THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the appellant inspite of notice. No steps were taken as ordered by this court. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SMA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial