Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subramanian vs Mohanan

Subramanian vs Mohanan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 11, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1913494

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1003/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subramanian

Respondent

Mohanan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday ,the 11th day of january 2019 / 21st pousha, 1940 rsa.no. 1003 of 2005 against the judgment and decree dated 17-02-2005 in as 366/2003 of ii addl.district court,ernakulam against the judgment and decree dated 27-06-2003 in os 1341/2001 of i addl.munsiff court, ernakulam appellant/appellant/plaintiff: subramanian mattakkatharaparambil house, methala desom and village, kottappuram p.o., kodungallur, thrissur district. by adv. sri.joseph franklin respondent/respondent/defendant: mohanan, s/o kumaran, proprietor, m/s.kumar cafe, opposite m/s.hindustan lever ltd., pachalam, ernakulam. by advs. sri.p.m.mujeeb rehiman sri.r.muraleekrishnan this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 11.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no. 1003 of 2005 2judgmentthe appellant and the counsel called absent, there was no representation. the case was posted today by ordering last chance last time. the appeal of the year 2005. hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge //true copy// p.a. to judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 21ST POUSHA, 1940 RSA.No. 1003 of 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17-02-2005 IN AS 366/2003 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27-06-2003 IN OS 1341/2001 of I ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: SUBRAMANIAN MATTAKKATHARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, METHALA DESOM AND VILLAGE, KOTTAPPURAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH FRANKLIN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: MOHANAN, S/O KUMARAN, PROPRIETOR, M/S.KUMAR CAFE, OPPOSITE M/S.HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD., PACHALAM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.P.M.MUJEEB REHIMAN SRI.R.MURALEEKRISHNAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No. 1003 of 2005 2

JUDGMENT

The appellant and the counsel called absent, there was no representation. The case was posted today by ordering last chance last time. The appeal of the year 2005. Hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial