Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

B.Venkatachalam vs the Commissioner

B.Venkatachalam vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1912789

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/15426/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B.Venkatachalam

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 02.06.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice n.anand venkatesh b.venkatachalam s/o.balasubramaniam petitioner vs 3.the assistant commissioner cum executive engineer respondentswrit petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2025 and to extent to license time limit for a period of 102 days to the petitioner within a time frame as may be fixed by this court. for petitioner : mr.s.velmurugan for respondents : mr.s.ravichandran additional government pleader ***** n.anand venkatesh, jgmorderlearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. recording the said endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. 02.06.2025 neutral citation: yes/no index: yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking ordergm to 3.the assistant commissioner cum executive engineer

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH B.Venkatachalam S/o.Balasubramaniam Petitioner Vs 3.The Assistant Commissioner Cum Executive Engineer Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2025 and to extent to license time limit for a period of 102 days to the petitioner within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Velmurugan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader ***** N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

gm

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the said endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 02.06.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

gm To 3.The Assistant Commissioner Cum Executive Engineer

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties B.Venkatachalam vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales