Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rathy, vs Unnikrishnan,

RATHY, vs Unnikrishnan,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 11, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1912731

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/684/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RATHY,

Respondent

Unnikrishnan,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday ,the 11th day of january 2019 / 21st pousha, 1940 rsa.no. 684 of 2005 against the judgment and decree dated 04-12-2004 in as 169/2002 of iii additional district court (adhoc), fast track court no.i, thrissur against the judgment and decree dated 05-06-2002 in o.s.no.671/2000 of munsiff court, wadakanchery appellant/respondent/defendant: rathy, w/o.kalathil sreenu, kavanam chittoor desom, chittanda village, thalappilly taluk. by advs. sri.rajit sri.ranjit babu respondent/appellant/plaintiff: unnikrishnan, s/o.kunnathvalappil kunjan, chittanda village, thalappilly taluk. by adv. sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 11.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no. 684 of 2005 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that they are not pressing the appeal. hence, dismissed as not pressed. sd/- p.somarajan judge //true copy// p.a. to judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 21ST POUSHA, 1940 RSA.No. 684 of 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04-12-2004 IN AS 169/2002 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), FAST TRACK COURT NO.I, THRISSUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05-06-2002 IN O.S.NO.671/2000 OF MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKANCHERY APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: RATHY, W/O.KALATHIL SREENU, KAVANAM CHITTOOR DESOM, CHITTANDA VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.KUNNATHVALAPPIL KUNJAN, CHITTANDA VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No. 684 of 2005 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that they are not pressing the appeal. Hence, dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. to Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial