Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.M.Ramakrishnan vs Pushpa

P.M.Ramakrishnan vs Pushpa

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 04, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1912508

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/609/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.M.Ramakrishnan

Respondent

Pushpa

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday ,the 04th day of january 2019 / 14th pousha, 1940 rsa.no. 609 of 2005 against the judgment and decree dated 30-11-2004 in as 355/2001 of ii addl.district court,palakkad against the judgment and decree dated 31-07-2001 in os 610/1998 of addl.munsiff court, palakkad appellant/appellant/defendant: 1 p.m.ramakrishnan s/o.late manikkam pillai, aged 59 years, proprietor, west co-engineering works, coimbatore road, koppam amsom, palghat. by advs. sri.c.p.chandrasekharan (calicut) smt.aparna c.menon respondent/respondent/plaintiff: pushpa, aged 50 years w/o.late sampath kumar, kolappuram house, coimbatore road, koppam amsom, palghat. by adv. sri.t.c.suresh menon this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 04.01.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no. 609 of 2005 2judgmentthe appellant and the counsel called absent, there was no representation. the matter was taken up two times on today. nobody represented the matter. the counsel for the respondent ready for argument. hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.sd/- p.somarajan judge msp //true copy// p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 14TH POUSHA, 1940 RSA.No. 609 of 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-11-2004 IN AS 355/2001 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,PALAKKAD AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31-07-2001 IN OS 610/1998 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: 1 P.M.RAMAKRISHNAN S/O.LATE MANIKKAM PILLAI, AGED 59 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, WEST CO-ENGINEERING WORKS, COIMBATORE ROAD, KOPPAM AMSOM, PALGHAT. BY ADVS. SRI.C.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN (CALICUT) SMT.APARNA C.MENON RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: PUSHPA, AGED 50 YEARS W/O.LATE SAMPATH KUMAR, KOLAPPURAM HOUSE, COIMBATORE ROAD, KOPPAM AMSOM, PALGHAT. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No. 609 of 2005 2

JUDGMENT

The appellant and the counsel called absent, there was no representation. The matter was taken up two times on today. Nobody represented the matter. The counsel for the respondent ready for argument. Hence, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial