Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.Kannadasan vs the Commissioner

M.Kannadasan vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 23, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1912138

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/26441/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Kannadasan

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 23.07.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice c.kumarappan m.kannadasan ... petitioner vs. chennai - 600 045. ... respondent writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the representation of the writ petition dated 03.04.2024 and direct the respondent to credit the pay hike benefits and salary increment to the petitioner in accordance with government orders within the time frame as fixed by this court. for petitioner : mr.s.janarthanam *****c.kumarappan, j.kvorderthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.2. in view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. 23.07.2025 kv index : yes/nospeaking order /non speaking orderneutral citation : yes/no to chennai - 600 045.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN M.Kannadasan ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai - 600 045. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the representation of the writ petition dated 03.04.2024 and direct the respondent to Credit the pay Hike benefits and salary increment to the petitioner in accordance with Government Orders within the time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Janarthanam *****

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

kv

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court record.

2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 23.07.2025 kv Index : Yes/No

Speaking order /Non Speaking Order

Neutral Citation : Yes/No To Chennai - 600 045.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial