Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Samivulla vs Range Forest Officer

Samivulla vs Range Forest Officer

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1911735

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/5640/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Samivulla

Respondent

Range Forest Officer

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 28th day of june, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice m.nagaprasanna criminal petition no. 5640 of 2022 between:1. samivulla s/o mohammed gouse aged about 40 years r/o h.k. road shiralakoppa shikaripura taluk shimogga district - 577401 …petitioner (by sri. shashidhar g., advocate) and:1. range forest officer sagara range sagara taluk digitally signed by nagaveni location: high 2. authorised officer and court of karnataka deputy conservator of forest sagar division sagar taluk rep. by the state public prosecutor high court buildings dr. ambedkar veedhi bengaluru - 560001 …respondents -2- this crl.p. is filed u/s.482 cr.p.c praying to a. to quash the notice dated 18.02.2022 issued by deputy conservator forest, sagar division, sagar and etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:orderthe case is called twice today. there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.2. this court on 21.06.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:“though this court has directed that the petition be dismissed in the event office objections would not be complied with, showing indulgence as a last chance, list the matter on 28.06.2024. in the event, office objections are not complied with, no submission will be entertained and the petition would be dismissed." even today, office objections are not complied with. therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. sd/- judge sjk list no.: 1 sl no.: 42

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5640 OF 2022 BETWEEN:

1. SAMIVULLA S/O MOHAMMED GOUSE AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O H.K. ROAD SHIRALAKOPPA SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT - 577401 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASHIDHAR G., ADVOCATE) AND:

1. RANGE FOREST OFFICER SAGARA RANGE SAGARA TALUK Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH 2. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND COURT OF KARNATAKA DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST SAGAR DIVISION SAGAR TALUK REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 …RESPONDENTS -2- THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO A. TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 18.02.2022 ISSUED BY DEPUTY CONSERVATOR FOREST, SAGAR DIVISION, SAGAR AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The case is called twice today. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. This Court on 21.06.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:

“Though this court has directed that the petition be dismissed in the event office objections would not be complied with, showing indulgence as a last chance, list the matter on 28.06.2024. In the event, office objections are not complied with, no submission will be entertained and the petition would be dismissed." Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial