Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suromani vs Mathiyalagan

Suromani vs Mathiyalagan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Nov 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1911634

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/4084/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suromani

Respondent

Mathiyalagan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 28.11.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice r.sakthivel and c.m.p.nos.21218, 21219, 21220 & 21221 of 2022 suromani … revision petitioner -vs- 1.mathiyalagan 2.selvamani 3.d.maharaja 4.d.robert 5.d.lillypushpam 6.d.latha 7.rajamani 8.d.vennila ...respondentsprayer: civil revision petitions filed under section 115 of cpc, praying to set aside the fair and final orders dated 9th november 2021 passed in i.a.nos.1 and 2 of 2019 in c.f.r.no.3275 of 2019 in unnumbered a.s. (now numbered a.s.no.22 of 2021 dated 23rd november 2021) on the file of the sub court, bhavani, and pass such further orders. for petitioners : no appearance for r1 & r4 : no appearancecommon orderwhen the matter came up for hearing on 12.11.2025, this court passed the following order:“ms.shalini, representing mr.a.sivaji, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioners submitted that the counsel on record has reported ‘no instructions’ from the petitioners. to that effect, the learned counsel has filed a memo dated 10.11.2025. the memo is recorded. 2.in view of the memo dated 10.11.2025, the registry is directed to print the name of the revision petitioners in the cause list and post the matter on 28.11.2025.”2. today, 28.11.2025, when the matters were taken up for hearing,there is no representation on either side. despite the names being printed in the cause list, neither the revision petitioners nor their representatives appeared before this court.3. hence, the above civil revision petitions are dismissed for default. consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed.considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no orderas to costs. 28.11.2025 cda index : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderto the sub court, bhavani.r.sakthivel, j.cda and c.m.p.nos.21218, 21219, 21220 & 21221 of 2022 28.11.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.11.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.Nos.21218, 21219, 21220 & 21221 of 2022 Suromani … Revision Petitioner -Vs- 1.Mathiyalagan 2.Selvamani 3.D.Maharaja 4.D.Robert 5.D.Lillypushpam 6.D.Latha 7.Rajamani 8.D.Vennila ...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of CPC, praying to set aside the fair and final orders dated 9th November 2021 passed in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2019 in C.F.R.No.3275 of 2019 in unnumbered A.S. (now numbered A.S.No.22 of 2021 dated 23rd November 2021) on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani, and pass such further orders. For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 & R4 : No appearance

COMMON ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing on 12.11.2025, this Court passed the following order:

“Ms.Shalini, representing Mr.A.Sivaji, learned Counsel on record for the Revision Petitioners submitted that the Counsel on record has reported ‘No instructions’ from the Petitioners. To that effect, the learned Counsel has filed a Memo dated 10.11.2025. The Memo is recorded. 2.In view of the Memo dated 10.11.2025, the Registry is directed to print the name of the Revision Petitioners in the cause list and post the matter on 28.11.2025.”

2. Today, 28.11.2025, when the matters were taken up for hearing,

there is no representation on either side. Despite the names being printed in the cause list, neither the Revision Petitioners nor their representatives appeared before this Court.

3. Hence, the above Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order

as to costs. 28.11.2025 cda Index : Yes/No

Speaking/Non-Speaking Order

To The Sub Court, Bhavani.

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

cda and C.M.P.Nos.21218, 21219, 21220 & 21221 of 2022 28.11.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial