Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager, vs M D Anandamurthy @ Ananda

The Manager, vs M D Anandamurthy @ Ananda

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Dec 14, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1911252

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/4217/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager,

Respondent

M D Anandamurthy @ Ananda

Excerpt

high court legal services committee, bengaluru before the national lok adalatin the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 14th day of december 2024 conciliators present: the hon’ble mr. justice h.p. sandesh & smt. p.v. kalpana, member m.f.a. no.4217/2020(eca) (lok adalat no.3294/2024) between1. the managershriram gic ltd. the manager e-8, riico industrial area seethapura jaipura rajasthan now rep by shriram gic ltd. no.5/4, 3rd floor s v arcade belekahalli main road off. b g road, limb post bengaluru-560076. ...appellant (by sri pradeep b, advocate) and1. m d anandamurthy @ ananda aged about 30 years s/o dodda javaraiah hassan2. maridevegowdamajor s/o veerabhadrappa hassan district …respondents this mfa is filed u/s 30(1) of employees compensation act, against the judgment and award dated 13.08.2019 passed in eca.no.7/2014 on the file of the senior civil judge and commissioner for employees compensation act, holenarasipura, awarding compensation of rs.3,13,492/- with interest at 12 percent p.a. from 22.06.2009 until realization and etc. this appeal coming on for conciliation before national lok adalat, the following conciliation order is passed.conciliation orderthe learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this court may be transferred to the claims tribunal. in view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. the amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the tribunal. judge member sn

Full Judgment

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A. No.4217/2020(ECA) (Lok Adalat No.3294/2024) BETWEEN

1. THE MANAGER

SHRIRAM GIC LTD. THE MANAGER E-8, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA SEETHAPURA JAIPURA RAJASTHAN NOW REP BY SHRIRAM GIC LTD. NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR S V ARCADE BELEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD OFF. B G ROAD, LIMB POST BENGALURU-560076. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI PRADEEP B, ADVOCATE) AND

1. M D ANANDAMURTHY @ ANANDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O DODDA JAVARAIAH HASSAN

2. MARIDEVEGOWDA

MAJOR S/O VEERABHADRAPPA HASSAN DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.08.2019 PASSED IN ECA.NO.7/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND COMMISSIONER FOR EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, HOLENARASIPURA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.3,13,492/- WITH INTEREST AT 12 PERCENT P.A. FROM 22.06.2009 UNTIL REALIZATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

CONCILIATION ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. JUDGE MEMBER SN

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial