Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri. a Krishna vs the Commissioner

Sri. a Krishna vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided May 27, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1910131

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/58034/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri. a Krishna

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 27th day of may, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice h.t. narendra prasad writ petition no. 58034 of 2018 (lb-bmp) between: sri. a krishna s/o late annaiah aged about 42 years r/at no.14, 1st floor m.r.lane, akkipet …petitioner (by sri. manjunatha s v.,advocate) and:1. the commissionercorporation building digitally signed rani chennamma circle by bengaluru - 560 002. hemalatha a location: high court of 2. the chief engineer (gandhinagar) karnataka bhashyam park, malleswarm south centre (sub-dvn) bengaluru - 560 003.3. the asst. executive engineer (gandhinagar) -2- cottonpet (sub-dn)4. the environment officer cottonpet sub-division …respondents (by sri.shiva reddy, aga. for respondents) this wp is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to-quash annexure-f, notice dated 20.11.2018 issued by the r-4 as without jurisdiction and infested with malafides.grant aninterim order to stay all further proceedings pursuant to annexure-f, notice dated 20.11.2018 issued by the r-4. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:order1. learned additional government advocate is directed to take notice to the respondents.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.02.2024 seeking leave of this court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. -3-3. the memo is placed on record.4. accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- judge dm list no.: 1 sl no.: 9

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 58034 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI. A KRISHNA S/O LATE ANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.14, 1ST FLOOR M.R.LANE, AKKIPET …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA S V.,ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER

CORPORATION BUILDING Digitally signed RANI CHENNAMMA CIRCLE by BENGALURU - 560 002. HEMALATHA A Location: High Court of 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (GANDHINAGAR) Karnataka BHASHYAM PARK, MALLESWARM SOUTH CENTRE (SUB-DVN) BENGALURU - 560 003.

3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (GANDHINAGAR) -2- COTTONPET (SUB-DN)

4. THE ENVIRONMENT OFFICER COTTONPET SUB-DIVISION …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHIVA REDDY, AGA. FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH ANNEXURE-F, NOTICE DATED 20.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND INFESTED WITH MALAFIDES.GRANT AN

INTERIM ORDER TO STAY ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO ANNEXURE-F, NOTICE DATED 20.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE R-4. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice to the respondents.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.02.2024 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed. -3-

3. The memo is placed on record.

4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial