Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. ASHOKAN Vs State Represented By Inspector Of Police

S. Ashokan vs State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1909262

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/9862/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Ashokan

Respondent

State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Excerpt

crl.m.p.no.9862 of 2025 in crl.r.c.sr.no.45614 of 2023g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 802 days in filing a criminal appeal against the order of execution of sentence and conviction passed by the learned sessions judge (fast track mahila), namakkal, dated 16.04.2021 passed in s.c.no.5 of 2020.2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 802 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 02.06.2025 lpp note: registry is directed to number the criminal appeal, if it is otherwise inorder.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

Crl.M.P.No.9862 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.45614 of 2023

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 802 days in filing a criminal appeal against the order of execution of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Sessions Judge (Fast Track Mahila), Namakkal, dated 16.04.2021 passed in S.C.No.5 of 2020.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 802 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 02.06.2025 Lpp Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in

order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial