Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhijith M vs State of Kerala

Abhijith M vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 10, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908541

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2852/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhijith M

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....perused the case diary.3. it is disclosed that the petitioner is a habitual offender and his previous cases in various police stations are as follows:- “1. crime no.1661/13 u/s.323, 377, 506(i) r/w 34 of ipc & sec.3(c), (d), 4 of posco act of chathannoor2. crime no.1336/17 u/s 452, 376, 380 of ipc of3. crime no.1437/17 u/s.45, 354(b), 419, 385 ipc of eravipuram.4. crime no.783/18 u/s.324, 308 ipc of5. crime no.1395/17 u/s.107 cr.p.c of6. crime no.1931/16 u/s.294b, 323 & 34 ipc of ..3..7. crime no.1512/17 u/s.294b, 323, 34 ipc of8. crime no.1171/16 u/s.452, 380 ipc of9. crime no.1111/15 u/s.457, 461, 380 ipc of10. crime no.1112/15 u/s.457, 461, 380 ipc of11. crime no.319/19 u/s.41(1)(d) & 102 cr.p.c. of paravoor police station.12. crime no.1620/15 u/s.454, 461, 380 & 34 of ipc of paravoor police station.13. crime no.439/19 u/s.457, 380 ipc of ayiroor14. crime no.658/19 u/s.380 ipc of varkala police station.”4. in view of the fact that the petitioner is a habitualoffender, the discretionary jurisdiction under section 438 of cr.p.c. cannot be extended to the petitioner. the anticipatory bail application is liable to be dismissed. in the result, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. sd/- n.anil kumar, judge skj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019/18TH ASWINA, 1941 Bail Appl..No.2852 OF 2019 Crime No..of Eravipuram Police Station, Kollam PETITIONER: ABHIJITH.M., AGED 21 YEARS, VALATHUNGAL, KUNNILTHIKKAL, ERAVIPURAM, KOLLAM. BY ADV.SRI.M.R.SARIN PANICKER RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, ERAVIPURAM KOLLAM, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR-SRI.SUMODU.P.N. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-10-2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. Perused the case diary.

3. It is disclosed that the petitioner is a habitual offender and his previous cases in various police stations are as follows:- “1. Crime No.1661/13 u/s.323, 377, 506(i) r/w 34 of IPC & Sec.3(c), (d), 4 of POSCO Act of Chathannoor

2. Crime No.1336/17 u/s 452, 376, 380 of IPC of

3. Crime No.1437/17 u/s.45, 354(B), 419, 385 IPC of Eravipuram.

4. Crime No.783/18 u/s.324, 308 IPC of

5. Crime No.1395/17 u/s.107 Cr.P.C of

6. Crime No.1931/16 u/s.294B, 323 & 34 IPC of ..3..

7. Crime No.1512/17 u/s.294B, 323, 34 IPC of

8. Crime No.1171/16 u/s.452, 380 IPC of

9. Crime No.1111/15 u/s.457, 461, 380 IPC of

10. Crime No.1112/15 u/s.457, 461, 380 IPC of

11. Crime No.319/19 u/s.41(1)(D) & 102 Cr.P.C. of Paravoor Police Station.

12. Crime No.1620/15 u/s.454, 461, 380 & 34 of IPC of Paravoor Police Station.

13. Crime No.439/19 u/s.457, 380 IPC of Ayiroor

14. Crime No.658/19 u/s.380 IPC of Varkala Police Station.”

4. In view of the fact that the petitioner is a habitual

offender, the discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. cannot be extended to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE skj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial