Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V.M.Sojan vs Deepak

V.M.Sojan vs Deepak

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 31, 2019
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908519

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1343/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.M.Sojan

Respondent

Deepak

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday, the 31st day of may 2019 / 10th jyaishta, 1941 rsa.no. 1343 of 2004 (b) against the decree & judgment dated 19-06-2004 in as no.180/2001 of sub court, thodupuzha against the decree & judgment dated 25-07-2001 in os no.410/1997 of munsiff court, thodupuzha appellant/appellant in the appellate court (plaintiff in the trial court): sojan, s/o mani, aged 47 years, vettickal, thodupuzha kara, thodupuzha village, thodupuzha taluk. by adv. sri.t.j.thomas respondents/respondents in the appellate court (defendants in the trial court):1 deepak, s/o karunakaran, aged 37 years, mylamthanath house, anakoodu bhagom, thodupuzha kara, thodupuzha village. 2 radhadevi amma, w/o karunakaran, aged 57 years, mylamthanathu house, anakodu bhagom, thodupuzha kara, thodupuzha village. by adv. sri.unnikrishnan.v.alapatt this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 31.05.2019. the court on the same day delivered the following: r.s.a.no.1343 of 2004 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the appellant is not pressing the appeal. hence, the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2019 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1941 RSA.No. 1343 of 2004 (B) AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 19-06-2004 IN AS No.180/2001 of SUB COURT, THODUPUZHA AGAINST THE DECREE & JUDGMENT DATED 25-07-2001 IN OS No.410/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT, THODUPUZHA APPELLANT/APPELLANT IN THE APPELLATE COURT (PLAINTIFF IN THE TRIAL COURT): SOJAN, S/o MANI, AGED 47 YEARS, VETTICKAL, THODUPUZHA KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.J.THOMAS RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE APPELLATE COURT (DEFENDANTS IN THE TRIAL COURT):

1 DEEPAK, S/o KARUNAKARAN, AGED 37 YEARS, MYLAMTHANATH HOUSE, ANAKOODU BHAGOM, THODUPUZHA KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE. 2 RADHADEVI AMMA, W/o KARUNAKARAN, AGED 57 YEARS, MYLAMTHANATHU HOUSE, ANAKODU BHAGOM, THODUPUZHA KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN.V.ALAPATT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.05.2019. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.S.A.No.1343 of 2004 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the appellant is not pressing the appeal. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial