Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayalakshmi vs Siva

Jayalakshmi vs SIVA

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 28, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908298

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
TR CMP/440/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayalakshmi

Respondent

SIVA

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 28.08.2025coram :the honourable mr. justice p.b.balaji and cmp.no.10192 of 2025 jayalakshmi ...petitioner vs. siva ...respondent transfer civil miscellaneous petition filed under section 24 of code of civil procedure to withdraw the petition in fcop.no.24 of 2024, from the file of the learned family judge, tiruvannamalai and transfer the same to the principal family court, chennai. for petitioner : m/s.s.ambigapathi for respondent : mr.d.vasanthakumarorderthe petitioner/wife seeks transfer of fcop.no.24 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned family judge, tiruvannamalai to the file of the principal family court, chennai. page no.1 of 52. learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submits that, the groundon which the petitioner seeks transfer of the fcop proceedings is that, the petitioner, though originally, resided in tiruvannamalai, however, she has now been transferred and posted in chennai and therefore, she is unable to attend the fcop proceedings before the learned family judge, tiruvannamalai. hence, the petitioner has come up with the present transfer petition.3. per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/husbandopposed the present transfer application stating that if the petitioner's request for transfer is accepted, it may give rise to further transfer request in future, in the event of the petitioner being transferred to other places out of chennai.4. i have heard the learned counsel on either side and i have also perused the affidavit filed in support of this transfer petition. page no.2 of 55. i find that initially when the fcop proceedings has beeninitiated by the respondent/husband before the learned family judge, tiruvannamalai, the petitioner/wife was very much residing in tiruvannamalai and therefore, the respondent cannot be found fault with for approaching the learned family judge, tiruvannamalai.6. at this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner oninstructions, gave an.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.08.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and CMP.No.10192 of 2025 Jayalakshmi ...Petitioner Vs. Siva ...Respondent Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the petition in FCOP.No.24 of 2024, from the file of the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai and transfer the same to the Principal Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Ambigapathi For Respondent : Mr.D.Vasanthakumar

ORDER

The petitioner/wife seeks transfer of FCOP.No.24 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai to the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai. Page No.1 of 5

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/wife submits that, the ground

on which the petitioner seeks transfer of the FCOP proceedings is that, the petitioner, though originally, resided in Tiruvannamalai, however, she has now been transferred and posted in Chennai and therefore, she is unable to attend the FCOP proceedings before the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present transfer petition.

3. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent/husband

opposed the present transfer application stating that if the petitioner's request for transfer is accepted, it may give rise to further transfer request in future, in the event of the petitioner being transferred to other places out of Chennai.

4. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and I have also perused the affidavit filed in support of this transfer petition. Page No.2 of 5

5. I find that initially when the FCOP proceedings has been

initiated by the respondent/husband before the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai, the petitioner/wife was very much residing in Tiruvannamalai and therefore, the respondent cannot be found fault with for approaching the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

6. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner on

instructions, gave an undertaking that, in the event of there being any future transfer and posting out of Chennai, no further transfer request would be made by the petitioner/wife.

7. Recording the above undertaking given by the learned counsel

for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the petitioner's transfer request and accordingly, the case in FCOP.No.24 of 2024 is withdrawn from the file of the learned Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai and the same is transferred to the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai, to be either taken up by the Principal Family Court, Chennai or assigned/allotted to any of the Additional Family Court, Chennai, taking into account the workload/ pendency of cases before the Family Courts, Chennai, at the Page No.3 of 5

discretion of the learned Principal Judge, Chennai. It is made clear that, the physical presence of the respondent/husband shall not be insisted upon by the Transferee Court during all the hearing dates and the respondent is entitled to be represented by the learned counsel of his choice and he shall appear before the Transferee Court, physically only when his presence is absolutely necessary for the purposes such as examination in chief and cross.

8. With the above directions, this Transfer Civil miscellaneous

petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 28.08.2025 skt Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No To

1. The Family Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Principal Family Court, Chennai. Page No.4 of 5

P.B. BALAJI, J.

skt and CMP.No.10192 of 2025 28.08.2025 Page No.5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial