Sri. G V Anand vs Sri. E. Nagaraja

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Nov 29, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1908190

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1908190
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Nov 29, 2024
Case Number: CRL.RP/482/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri. G V Anand

Respondent

Sri. E. Nagaraja

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of november, 2024 before the hon'ble mr justice v srishananda criminal revision petition no. 482 of 2016 between: sri. g.v. anand, s/o veerabadhregowda, aged about 50 years, r/at no.390, in front of the h.p. gas office, hassan district - 570 001. …petitioner (by sri. puneeth b.s, advocate for sri. m. sharass chandra, advocate)and: sri. e. nagaraja, s/o k. eerappa, aged about 60 years, r/at konanur grama, digitally konanur hobli, arkalgud taluk, signed by hassan district - 570 002. malatesh kc …respondent (by smt. s.b. lakshmi, advocate) location: high this crl.rp is filed u/s.397 r/w 401 of cr.p.c court of praying to set aside the judgment and order dated karnataka18.11.2015 in crl.a.no.104/2014 passed by the ii addl. dist. and s.j., hassan, confirming the judgment andorder dated 18.07.2014 passed by the civil judge andjmfc at arkalgud in c.c.no.344/2009 and consequently acquit the petitioner. this petition, coming on for hearing, this day,order was made therein as under:-2- coram: hon'ble mr justice v srishanandaoral ordera memo is filed by learned counsel for revision petitioner. memo reads as under: “it is submitted that pendency of the said crl.rev.petition, the petitioner was died. hence filed this memo and same may be taken on record in the ends of justice.”in view of the memo, revision petition stands dismissed as abated. amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the respondent/complainant under due identification. however, if the information provided by learned counsel for the revision petitioner is incorrect, respondent is at liberty to execute the impugned order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial magistrate confirmed by the first appellate court. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kav list no.: 1 sl no.: 57/ct: bhk

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 482 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI. G.V. ANAND, S/O VEERABADHREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.390, IN FRONT OF THE H.P. GAS OFFICE, HASSAN DISTRICT - 570 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUNEETH B.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. SHARASS CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND: SRI. E. NAGARAJA, S/O K. EERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT KONANUR GRAMA, Digitally KONANUR HOBLI, ARKALGUD TALUK, signed by HASSAN DISTRICT - 570 002. MALATESH KC …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. S.B. LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C COURT OF PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED KARNATAKA

18.11.2015 IN CRL.A.NO.104/2014 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DIST. AND S.J., HASSAN, CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND

ORDER DATED 18.07.2014 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND

JMFC AT ARKALGUD IN C.C.NO.344/2009 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

-2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by learned counsel for revision petitioner. Memo reads as under: “It is submitted that pendency of the said Crl.Rev.Petition, the petitioner was died. Hence filed this memo and same may be taken on record in the ends of justice.”

In view of the memo, revision petition stands dismissed as abated. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the respondent/complainant under due identification. However, if the information provided by learned counsel for the revision petitioner is incorrect, respondent is at liberty to execute the impugned order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57/CT: BHK

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 2024 Same Parties Sri. G V Anand vs Sri. E. Nagaraja Same Judge V Srishananda